Re: [PATCH] Add diamond

2015-06-17 Thread Mark H Weaver
Ben Woodcroft writes: > On 17/06/15 14:54, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> I wouldn't normally do this, but I went ahead and tested it with these >> changes and here's what it comes out to: > Thanks very much for taking the time to do this. I've attached the > updated patch. Pushed, thanks! > Wasn't su

Re: [PATCH] Add diamond

2015-06-17 Thread Ben Woodcroft
On 17/06/15 14:54, Mark H Weaver wrote: I wouldn't normally do this, but I went ahead and tested it with these changes and here's what it comes out to: Thanks very much for taking the time to do this. I've attached the updated patch. Wasn't sure if there a standard way to thank you in the commi

Re: [PATCH] Add diamond

2015-06-16 Thread Mark H Weaver
Ben Woodcroft writes: > From e24f4de21ee3c367c38e431626f4796795eb9e18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ben Woodcroft > Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:49:27 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add diamond. > > * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (diamond): New variable. > --- > gnu/packages/bioinformatics.sc

Re: [PATCH] Add diamond

2015-06-16 Thread Mark H Weaver
Ben Woodcroft writes: > I'm quite new, so I strongly suspect there might be fixups required, > but it works on my box. Well, it works on my setup in an isolated .scm > file, but I wasn't sure how to test after I had patched > bioinformatics.scm i.e. I expected the following to work. Thanks, > the

[PATCH] Add diamond

2015-06-16 Thread Ben Woodcroft
Hi, I'm quite new, so I strongly suspect there might be fixups required, but it works on my box. Well, it works on my setup in an isolated .scm file, but I wasn't sure how to test after I had patched bioinformatics.scm i.e. I expected the following to work. Thanks, there's a couple more patch