Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> This may not even be necessary; the developer replied with a hint and
> attached is a patch that should fix the build on non-x86_64
> architectures. It builds fine locally with
>
> ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i686-linux hisat
>
> Does this look okay?
[...]
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:04:22PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> This may not even be necessary; the developer replied with a hint and
> attached is a patch that should fix the build on non-x86_64
> architectures. It builds fine locally with
> ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i686-linux his
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> I wrote the author an email to ask whether this can be fixed upstream
>> for other architectures than x86_64. Until then should I just declare
>> x86_64 as the only supported architecture?
>
> Probably yes, with a comment pointing to this d
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> I wrote the author an email to ask whether this can be fixed upstream
> for other architectures than x86_64. Until then should I just declare
> x86_64 as the only supported architecture?
Probably yes, with a comment pointing to this discussion and possibly
the one with
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:14:13PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> A recurring error is apparently related to embedded assembly
> instructions:
> I wrote the author an email to ask whether this can be fixed upstream
> for other architectures than x86_64. Until then should I just declare
> x86_64 as
Andreas Enge writes:
> the package fails to build on i686:
>http://hydra.gnu.org/build/247325
> Could you maybe have a look?
Thanks for notifying me.
A recurring error is apparently related to embedded assembly
instructions:
~
...
bt2_idx.h: Assembler messages:
bt2_idx.h:489: Error: in
Hello,
the package fails to build on i686:
http://hydra.gnu.org/build/247325
Could you maybe have a look?
Andreas
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> From 5696a8227d98d60d38f0ff19b40a21ccb13e53f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ricardo Wurmus
> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:13:26 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add HISAT.
>
> * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (hisat): New variable.
LGTM, thanks!
Ludo’.
referable to the
long list.
>> +(license license:gpl3)))
>
> GPLv3-only?
You were right: it's GPLv3+. My apologies.
>From 5696a8227d98d60d38f0ff19b40a21ccb13e53f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ricardo Wurmus
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:13:26 +0100
Subject: [PA
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> If it’s possible to avoid the whole list using ‘find-files’ or
> ‘scandir’, that would be nicer IMO. If it’s not, that’s fine.
>
>> +(license license:gpl3)))
>
> GPLv3-only?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ludo’.
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> From 305768bfef9bf4bc8d57828e27b8439dedd574bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ricardo Wurmus
> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:13:26 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add HISAT.
>
> * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (hisat): New variable.
Overall looks good t
rom 305768bfef9bf4bc8d57828e27b8439dedd574bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ricardo Wurmus
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:13:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add HISAT.
* gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (hisat): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 77 -
1 file changed,
12 matches
Mail list logo