On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 04:57:07PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> There does not appear to be a proper upstream for this script, so after
> discussing this we decided not to download the file from the Gentoo
> package sources but rather provide it with Guix.
But could you not add it as a patch (un
Andreas Enge writes:
> Speaking of java, I have a file
>gnu/packages/javac.in
> which is under version control, and which is required to compile guix.
This is a template for a wrapper script around GCJ to convert
javac-style arguments to arguments GCJ can understand. It's needed to
compile
Speaking of java, I have a file
gnu/packages/javac.in
which is under version control, and which is required to compile guix.
It has been introduced there:
commit 74574fd1e3fad5e0c1d061ce194e47dde0f7f175
Author: Ricardo Wurmus
Date: Tue Dec 23 12:31:50 2014 +0100
gnu: Add GCJ
*
Andreas Enge writes:
> I just replaced the debian java with the icedtea6 you packaged in my android
> project, and it works well! Do you also plan to package ant?
That's great! I'm glad it actually works!
I already packaged ant-minimal with only the most basic features
enabled, as most additio
Hello,
I just replaced the debian java with the icedtea6 you packaged in my android
project, and it works well! Do you also plan to package ant?
Andreas
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:47:17AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> I pushed without disabling any platform yet. Based on the build results
> I will update the package.
It does not build on mips:
http://hydra.gnu.org/build/224665
My guess would be that the bootstrap binaries are for i?86 platfor
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> I rewrote this to instead check the generated test logs in test/ for
>> lines starting with "Error:" or "FAILED:". To disable tests I wrapped
>> it in an (or #t ...) as the argument #:tests? #f does not disable a
>> custom check phase.
>>
>> 'check
>>
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>>> + (substitute* "Makefile.in"
>>> + ;; link against libgcj to avoid linker error
>>> + (("-o native-ecj")
>>> + "-lgcj -o native-ecj")
>>> + ;; do not leak information about the
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> * I'm not happy with replacing the unpack phase and I don't like to
>> refer to the OpenJDK source tarball by its full name
>> "openjdk-6-src-b34-20_jan_2015.tar.xz". Is there a way around this?
>
> You can just call it whatever you want in the 2nd argument to
> ‘cop
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> attached is a patch that gives us the liberated OpenJDK in the form of
> IcedTea (version 6). IcedTea 6 is built with GCJ. Unfortunately, it
> needs Ant, which cannot be built with GCJ, so it depends on a binary
> bootstrap Ant.
OK.
> There are a couple of issues wit
Hi Guix,
attached is a patch that gives us the liberated OpenJDK in the form of
IcedTea (version 6). IcedTea 6 is built with GCJ. Unfortunately, it
needs Ant, which cannot be built with GCJ, so it depends on a binary
bootstrap Ant.
There are a couple of issues with this patch set that I'm aware
11 matches
Mail list logo
