Re: [Outreachy] First version of my proposed timeline

2018-11-04 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Thanks Laura, Laura Lazzati ezt írta (időpont: 2018. nov. 4., V, 16:13): >> >> I went through your timeline in detail and find it impressive. No, I >> don't see any optional questions that need to be answered. >> > Thank you for your compliment :) Maybe I will send it today. > Regards! > Laura I

Re: [Outreachy] First version of my proposed timeline

2018-11-04 Thread Laura Lazzati
> > I went through your timeline in detail and find it impressive. No, I > don't see any optional questions that need to be answered. > > Thank you for your compliment :) Maybe I will send it today. Regards! Laura >

Re: [Outreachy] First version of my proposed timeline

2018-11-04 Thread Björn Höfling
On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 23:47:54 -0300 Laura Lazzati wrote: > Sorry for writing again, would someone like me to add or change > anything here? > Shall I write something in the optional questions? > Gabor said it was fine, but if you don't mind I would like to have > both opinions. And if Ricardo and L

Re: [Outreachy] First version of my proposed timeline

2018-11-03 Thread Laura Lazzati
Sorry for writing again, would someone like me to add or change anything here? Shall I write something in the optional questions? Gabor said it was fine, but if you don't mind I would like to have both opinions. And if Ricardo and Ludo want to, I am open to their suggestions too :) I haven't sent m

Re: [Outreachy] First version of my proposed timeline

2018-10-31 Thread Laura Lazzati
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 8:24 AM Björn Höfling < bjoern.hoefl...@bjoernhoefling.de> wrote: > Hi Laura, > > Sorry, I would like to look into it in full detail and have it on my > list, but didn't find the time. > > Looking roughly over it, it's fine Ok, thanks! As I said, it was my first proposal a

Re: [Outreachy] First version of my proposed timeline

2018-10-31 Thread Björn Höfling
Hi Laura, On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 08:18:34 -0300 Laura Lazzati wrote: > Sorry for writing again on this thread, could someone else have a > look on this? Or is it fine to leave it as it is? :) Sorry, I would like to look into it in full detail and have it on my list, but didn't find the time. Look

Re: [Outreachy] First version of my proposed timeline

2018-10-31 Thread Laura Lazzati
Sorry for writing again on this thread, could someone else have a look on this? Or is it fine to leave it as it is? :) On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:00 AM Laura Lazzati wrote: > > Looks good to me so far. >> > Thanks! > >> >> If anyone would like to see a more details please write you comments. >>

Re: [Outreachy] First version of my proposed timeline

2018-10-30 Thread Laura Lazzati
> Looks good to me so far. > Thanks! > > If anyone would like to see a more details please write you comments. > Thanks! > Yes, please :) As I mentioned, I sent it more than a week before the deadline so that we can discuss it in case anyone feels that something should be changed, personally I try

Re: [Outreachy] First version of my proposed timeline

2018-10-30 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello Laura, Laura Lazzati ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 29., H, 22:50): > > Hi everyone! > > Here goes my first version of the proposed timeline. I wanted to send it > today so that we have enough time to refine it. > I wrote it taking into account the number of Weeks, the days of the month >

[Outreachy] First version of my proposed timeline

2018-10-29 Thread Laura Lazzati
Hi everyone! Here goes my first version of the proposed timeline. I wanted to send it today so that we have enough time to refine it. I wrote it taking into account the number of Weeks, the days of the month implied in that week, and the month/year. WEEK1: 4-10 (December 2018) * Study more deeply