On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:01:08PM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> By the way, I could not rebase+push, upstream complains that I cannot push
> non-fast-forward commits and that I should pull first. How am I supposed to
> rebase my branch?
For wip-* branches [0], please delete the branch remotel
Done.
By the way, I could not rebase+push, upstream complains that I cannot push
non-fast-forward commits and that I should pull first. How am I supposed to
rebase my branch?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Pierre,
On Sun, 02 Sep 2018 18:59:12 +0200
Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> I tried your suggestion.
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> (snippet
> '(begin
>(substitute* "contrib/swank-listener-hooks.lisp"
> ((":compile-toplevel :
Hey Pierre,
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 21:18:39 +0200
Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Thanks for the details.
>
> Here is the full backtrace when I attempt to build sbcl-slime-swank
> with PR #433 (https://github.com/slime/slime/pull/433):
>
[...]
> ;
> /gnu/store/223af099vkzml89z1y8m654clsja8xph-sbcl-s
Thanks for the details.
Here is the full backtrace when I attempt to build sbcl-slime-swank with PR #433
(https://github.com/slime/slime/pull/433):
--8<---cut here---start->8---
> ./pre-inst-env guix build -K sbcl-slime-swank
;;; note: source file /home/ambreva
Hi Pierre,
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:42:27 +0200
Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
[...]
> One thing I'd like to understand about Common Lisp packages in Guix,
> if you can shed some light on this: the build system uses ASDF to
> "bundle compile" the entire package into a
> single /gnu/store/…-PACKAGE/lib/P
Hi all,
There are a few different messages in this thread that I could reply
to, but I'll do my best to address them all here.
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:56:19 +0200
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
>
> > I have no clue what this SWANK-BACKEND is.
Thank you, Ludo.
Upstream suggests a patch to the ASDF system definition. I'll try that later.
I've pushed the current state of work to the 'wip-next-browser' branch.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Pierre,
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> I have no clue what this SWANK-BACKEND is. I can find SWANK/BACKEND in
> the source however. Maybe my misunderstanding of Common Lisp...
>
> Any clue?
I’m clueless ;-) but I’ve Cc’d one of our local CL experts.
Any ideas, Andy?
Ludo’.
I've also reported the issue at https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/457.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
In the long path of packaging Next browsing, I found myself packaging
the mgl-pax dependency.
http://quickdocs.org/mgl-pax/
This package depends on SWANK which is packaged in emacs-slime.
emacs-slime contains two pieces of code:
- SLIME (the Emacs package)
- SWANK: the Common Lisp backend
11 matches
Mail list logo
