ng0 skribis:
> Could we make an exception for torsocks here, or should we stick with
> 2.0.0 until 2.2.0 has a version release?
I don’t think so. :-) I use torsocks 2.0.0 just fine, FWIW.
A release candidate is normally promptly followed by a release, so we
should use that as soon as it’s ava
Hi,
I have this in use on Gentoo and GuixSD systems now for some time.
I know that we do not (?) package release candidate versions, but this
would fix our much older current torsocks. 2.1.x fails for some reasons,
this fixes it. There should be a release hopefully soon, otherwise I'll
ask tor-dev
>From fe94e760b8705f2972f04b565f02528a953277ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:08:43 +
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: torsocks: Update to 2.2.0-rc1.
* gnu/packages/tor.scm (torsocks): Update to 2.2.0-rc1.
---
gnu/packages/tor.scm | 14 +++---
1 file changed, 7 ins
Hi,
this is an update of torsocks to 2.2.0-rc1 as announced
on tor-dev recently.
It's no official release yet, but it is a signed tarball
and unlike 2.1.0 our patch for the dns-test seems to get
applied correctly.
Feel free to use, I will update the patch as soon as 2.2.0
is officially released.
