Alex Kost skribis:
> From 3b221f12e6f5be01166772f5b23b648903342954 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Kost
> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 13:18:20 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] system: Rename 'sudoers' into 'sudoers-file'.
>
> * gnu/system.scm (): Rename record field.
> (etc-directory): Rename argumen
On 2015-06-15 09:17, Alex Kost wrote:
Daniel Pimentel (2015-06-15 01:52 +0300) wrote:
On 2015-06-14 09:47, Alex Kost wrote:
Hello,
Since there is no real difference between 'sudoers' and 'hosts-file'
fields (of operating-system declaration), what about renaming one of
them? So it could be ei
Ludovic Courtès (2015-06-15 00:48 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> Since there is no real difference between 'sudoers' and 'hosts-file'
>> fields (of operating-system declaration), what about renaming one of
>> them?
>
> Makes sense.
>
>> So it could be either:
>>
>> 'sudoers-file' and '
Daniel Pimentel (2015-06-15 01:52 +0300) wrote:
> On 2015-06-14 09:47, Alex Kost wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Since there is no real difference between 'sudoers' and 'hosts-file'
>> fields (of operating-system declaration), what about renaming one of
>> them? So it could be either:
>>
>> 'sudoers-fil
On 2015-06-14 09:47, Alex Kost wrote:
Hello,
Since there is no real difference between 'sudoers' and 'hosts-file'
fields (of operating-system declaration), what about renaming one of
them? So it could be either:
'sudoers-file' and 'hosts-file'
or
'sudoers' and 'hosts'
(I prefer the latt
Alex Kost skribis:
> Since there is no real difference between 'sudoers' and 'hosts-file'
> fields (of operating-system declaration), what about renaming one of
> them?
Makes sense.
> So it could be either:
>
> 'sudoers-file' and 'hosts-file'
>
> or
>
> 'sudoers' and 'hosts'
>
> (I prefer t
Hello,
Since there is no real difference between 'sudoers' and 'hosts-file'
fields (of operating-system declaration), what about renaming one of
them? So it could be either:
'sudoers-file' and 'hosts-file'
or
'sudoers' and 'hosts'
(I prefer the latter variant)
--
Alex
