Hello again Miguel,
I apologize for the delay. My semester at university is becoming
busier as final exams get closer!
On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 01:58 +0100, Miguel Arruga Vivas wrote:
> Hi Kei,
...
> > > - The patch for gedit contains a reference to libgd, wouldn't it
> > > be
> > >clearer for
Hi Kei,
Kei Kebreau writes:
> Miguel Arruga Vivas writes:
> Boot and login worked properly for me after I cleared the contents of
> my /var/lib/gdm directory (if it's unclear why that directory
> matters, see
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-10/msg00421.html
> for a quick ov
Hi Kei,
Kei Kebreau writes:
> `git push --force-with-lease` doesn't seem to work on the WIP branch.
> This is a good thing in general, but how do I rewrite history? Do I
> just delete the remote WIP branch and recreate a new one with the
> appropriate changes?
Yup! This is what I do for “wip-h
On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 12:46 -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 06:38:05PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote:
> > > - The patch for libdazzle only changes the xorg-server, as it
> > > already
> > >is at version 3.33.90 in master. It still makes sense as a
> > > patch,
> > >but the
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 06:38:05PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote:
> > - The patch for libdazzle only changes the xorg-server, as it already
> >is at version 3.33.90 in master. It still makes sense as a patch,
> >but the title indicates a version downgrade.
> >
>
> Good catch! I'd correct thi
Miguel Arruga Vivas writes:
> Hi Kei,
>
> Kei Kebreau writes:
>> Update: Please check out the new wip-gnome-updates branch of the Guix
>> git repository for continued updates. The contents of the notabug.org
>> link given above will be changed to a notice that says to do this.
>
> Thank you ver
Hi Kei,
Kei Kebreau writes:
> Update: Please check out the new wip-gnome-updates branch of the Guix
> git repository for continued updates. The contents of the notabug.org
> link given above will be changed to a notice that says to do this.
Thank you very much for this huge effort. I've been p
Kei Kebreau writes:
> Timothy Sample writes:
>
>> Hi Kei,
>>
>> Kei Kebreau writes:
>>
>>> Anyone want to see the 54 patches and possibly help me root around for
>>> the issue?
>>
>> I would love to take a look at it! I’ve been a little tied up, but I
>> should have some time tomorrow or the n
Hi Marius,
Marius Bakke writes:
> LGTM. It needs a corresponding entry in doc/guix.texi though.
Pushed with an update to the docs. Thanks for the suggestion and
review!
-- Tim
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" writes:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:07:06PM -0400, Timothy Sample wrote:
>> There’s a “glib-or-gtk?” flag for the Meson build system. Setting it to
>> “#t” in the “mutter” package makes GDM and GNOME work in a VM.
>
> Thank you for investigating, I suppose this fixe
Timothy Sample writes:
> Hi Marius,
>
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> Timothy Sample writes:
>>
>>> [1] It’s not obvious, but if you edit the GDM configuration file
>>> generation code in “gnu/services/xorg.scm”, you can enable debug output
>>> for GDM. The debug output is usually extremely helpfu
Hi Marius,
Marius Bakke writes:
> Timothy Sample writes:
>
>> [1] It’s not obvious, but if you edit the GDM configuration file
>> generation code in “gnu/services/xorg.scm”, you can enable debug output
>> for GDM. The debug output is usually extremely helpful!
>
> Could that be exposed as a to
Timothy Sample writes:
> [1] It’s not obvious, but if you edit the GDM configuration file
> generation code in “gnu/services/xorg.scm”, you can enable debug output
> for GDM. The debug output is usually extremely helpful!
Could that be exposed as a toggle in the service configuration?
signatu
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:07:06PM -0400, Timothy Sample wrote:
> There’s a “glib-or-gtk?” flag for the Meson build system. Setting it to
> “#t” in the “mutter” package makes GDM and GNOME work in a VM.
Thank you for investigating, I suppose this fixes your issue.
webkitgtk failed again for me th
Hi again,
Timothy Sample writes:
> I’ll report back if I have good luck with fsck and am able to do more
> testing. :)
I was able to build everything and start testing. To use “guix system
vm” I had to disable tests in QEMU due to a failure. I did not
investigate it.
This turned up in the l
Hi Kei and Florian,
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" writes:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:29:33PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>> I've pushed my changes to the following repository for anyone who wants
>> to take a look:
>>
>> https://notabug.org/kei/guix-gnome-updates
>
> I tried reproducing your fai
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:29:33PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
> I've pushed my changes to the following repository for anyone who wants
> to take a look:
>
> https://notabug.org/kei/guix-gnome-updates
I tried reproducing your failure but webkitgtk failed to build.
make[2]: Leaving directory '/tmp
Timothy Sample writes:
> Hi Kei,
>
> Kei Kebreau writes:
>
>> Anyone want to see the 54 patches and possibly help me root around for
>> the issue?
>
> I would love to take a look at it! I’ve been a little tied up, but I
> should have some time tomorrow or the next day. I think it would be
> ea
Hi Kei,
Kei Kebreau writes:
> Anyone want to see the 54 patches and possibly help me root around for
> the issue?
I would love to take a look at it! I’ve been a little tied up, but I
should have some time tomorrow or the next day. I think it would be
easiest to push it to some world-readable
Kei Kebreau writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> Kei Kebreau writes:
>>
>>> I have news! The good part is that I got 54 packages to build on top of
>>> master. The bad part is that when I try to use the resulting packages as
>>> my system configuration, my computer gets stuck in tty1, and at
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Kei Kebreau writes:
>
>> I have news! The good part is that I got 54 packages to build on top of
>> master. The bad part is that when I try to use the resulting packages as
>> my system configuration, my computer gets stuck in tty1, and attempting
>> to switch to Xorg on
Kei Kebreau writes:
> I have news! The good part is that I got 54 packages to build on top of
> master. The bad part is that when I try to use the resulting packages as
> my system configuration, my computer gets stuck in tty1, and attempting
> to switch to Xorg on tty7 leaves my screen frozen
Marius Bakke writes:
> Kei Kebreau writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> Hello Kei,
>>>
>>> Kei Kebreau skribis:
>>>
I have the GNOME 3.32 branch! I'm building it on top of the new
core-updates as you read this message. If everything still builds, I'll
immediately send my
Kei Kebreau writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Hello Kei,
>>
>> Kei Kebreau skribis:
>>
>>> I have the GNOME 3.32 branch! I'm building it on top of the new
>>> core-updates as you read this message. If everything still builds, I'll
>>> immediately send my changes to the guix-patches mailing
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Kei,
>
> Kei Kebreau skribis:
>
>> I have the GNOME 3.32 branch! I'm building it on top of the new
>> core-updates as you read this message. If everything still builds, I'll
>> immediately send my changes to the guix-patches mailing list for review
>> and testing.
Hello Kei,
Kei Kebreau skribis:
> I have the GNOME 3.32 branch! I'm building it on top of the new
> core-updates as you read this message. If everything still builds, I'll
> immediately send my changes to the guix-patches mailing list for review
> and testing.
Shouldn’t you instead base it on ‘
Marius Bakke writes:
> Guix,
>
> As you know, the "quarterly" core-updates rebuild took almost a full
> year this previous cycle. There are already 35 commits on the
> 'core-updates-next' branch, and I've heard rumors of a GNOME 3.32 branch
> lurking somewhere.
>
> To prevent this work from rott
Hi,
Svante Signell skribis:
> On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 16:32 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Mathieu, I guess you can go ahead and rename ‘core-updates-next’ to
>> ‘core-updates’ if nobody’s done it yet.
>>
>> Let’s get the ball rolling!
>
> What's the status of the GNU/Hurd port with
On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 16:32 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Mathieu, I guess you can go ahead and rename ‘core-updates-next’ to
> ‘core-updates’ if nobody’s done it yet.
>
> Let’s get the ball rolling!
What's the status of the GNU/Hurd port with this core-updates release,
better or worse
Hey Ludo,
> Mathieu, I guess you can go ahead and rename ‘core-updates-next’ to
> ‘core-updates’ if nobody’s done it yet.
Done! We have a new core-updates branch open.
Mathieu
Hi!
Mathieu Othacehe skribis:
>> To prevent this work from rotting away, I propose that we start the
>> branch as early as next month. With luck, users will be able to
>> cross-compile Guix System for arbitrary toys come December ;-)
>>
>> Thoughts?
Let’s do that!
> Seems like a good plan :)
Hey Marius,
> To prevent this work from rotting away, I propose that we start the
> branch as early as next month. With luck, users will be able to
> cross-compile Guix System for arbitrary toys come December ;-)
>
> Thoughts?
Seems like a good plan :)
Mathieu
Guix,
As you know, the "quarterly" core-updates rebuild took almost a full
year this previous cycle. There are already 35 commits on the
'core-updates-next' branch, and I've heard rumors of a GNOME 3.32 branch
lurking somewhere.
To prevent this work from rotting away, I propose that we start the
33 matches
Mail list logo
