Re: gnu: Add weechat

2014-09-11 Thread lemonnierk
> I've applied your patch in f489668 with some minor changes: Thanks ! > changed to "*an* Internet..." and double spaces after end-of-sentence > period. I wondered if I had to put a or an, good to know ! -- Kevin Lemonnier PGP Fingerprint : C123 47CA 9E64 FCF0 3907 signature.asc Description:

Re: gnu: Add weechat

2014-09-11 Thread lemonnierk
Thanks for the comments, here is a new patch hopefully addressing those. I had a little trouble copying the © with emacs at first, don't know why it wasn't in my first patch :). From d0ade7847532749120946abe2c8e8810ad96b501 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Lemonnier Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 01:

gnu: Add weechat

2014-09-11 Thread lemonnierk
Hi, I have enabled all the plugins (python, perl, lua, tcl, aspell and ofcourse guile) except ruby that I commented out until a package exists. From 8d8d1e052623d052834c84cbf433d5ca95c6e513 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Lemonnier Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:32:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] gnu

Re: gnu: Have lua-5.1 compile a .so

2014-09-11 Thread lemonnierk
Didn't think of that, indeed. I know I'm not using the .a, don't know about others though. On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:02:49PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > lemonni...@ulrar.net skribis: > > > According to someone on stackoverflow, "The lua team does not include > > support for > > shared libr

Re: gnu: Have lua-5.1 compile a .so

2014-09-11 Thread lemonnierk
Hi, According to someone on stackoverflow, "The lua team does not include support for shared libraries by default because doing so in a portable manner is not simple." http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20848275/compiling-lua-create-so-files But I believe all distributions have some kind of way

gnu: Have lua-5.1 compile a .so

2014-09-10 Thread lemonnierk
Hi, While working on getting weechat to build with the lua plugin enabled, I noticed the lua package doesn't produce a liblua.so file. So here is a patch to make it do so. It's basically the same patch as in ArchLinux, with a few differences like actually installing the .so file. From 85a422fb581

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add zsh

2014-09-08 Thread lemonnierk
Thanks a lot for the feedback. Here is the new patch : From 7352f5876a2c3942ebab92e30f659a62cd7bca7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Lemonnier Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 21:06:31 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add zsh * gnu/packages/zsh.scm: New file * gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it ---

[PATCH] gnu: Add zsh

2014-09-07 Thread lemonnierk
Hi, This is my first package, so I'd be interested to know if there is things that could be done better. For the license, most of the files uses their own license but a few are under GPL, so I put that. Is that right, or should I put (license (x11-style "file://LICENCE")) as suggested on irc any