Re: Guix as a Guile package manager

2016-01-09 Thread Fabio Pesari
On 01/09/2016 04:30 PM, Thompson, David wrote: > > I don't think Guix is a good fit here, because there's simply no way > around the fact that Guix packages *must* contain the full dependency > graph for build-time and runtime dependencies. There's no way that > you could use, say, the Guile or GC

Re: Guix as a Guile package manager

2016-01-09 Thread Fabio Pesari
On 01/09/2016 03:35 PM, Amirouche Boubekki wrote: > > Can you explain what a Guile specific fork of guix will bring over guix? See the last part of this post. >> User should be able to upload packages but each package should be >> carefully reviewed (possibly by the community itself). > > This i

Re: Guix as a Guile package manager

2016-01-09 Thread Fabio Pesari
On 01/09/2016 02:05 PM, Amirouche Boubekki wrote: > Héllo, Hi! > There is a package manager https://github.com/ijp/guildhall with a > package > repository with automatic package publishing without review. There are many package managers actually, and most of them were abandoned by their maintai

Guix as a Guile package manager

2016-01-09 Thread Fabio Pesari
Package managers have been immensely successful in increasing the popularity of programming languages - think about Perl's CPAN or Ruby's Gem. But Guile doesn't a package manager, and that in my opinion slows down its adoption. The Guix repos distribute a lot of useful Guile libraries (like guile-

Re: Adding tags to packages

2016-01-03 Thread Fabio Pesari
On 01/03/2016 04:04 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Maintaining tags means agreeing on a set of tags and adjusting it as we > see fit, adding tags to existing packages, reviewing them for new > packages, etc. I can see why this might sound like a lot of work, but what if all distros worked together

Re: Adding tags to packages

2016-01-03 Thread Fabio Pesari
On 01/03/2016 03:20 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > We must also keep in mind the cost of maintaining them and the > associated infrastructure. > > Ludo’. Sorry but what does maintaining tags mean? I'm not talking about a user tag system like Libre.fm, I'm talking about a simple tag list in packag

Re: Adding tags to packages

2016-01-02 Thread Fabio Pesari
Sorry to bump an old thread but I agree with the OP that tags in packages would be very helpful, and I can think of at least one use case in which they might be necessary: games. While game genre can be put into the description, games right now are not all in the same .scm files (for example, gnom