Hi,
In general I've been trying to avoid to take part in the conversation
because I basically don't know what to say.
I have a codeberg account that I use with my students, and I also have
github and gitlab accounts. I also have one account in many gitlab
instances of projects I contributed
On 2025-01-03 6:24 PM, Ian Eure wrote:
Hello Guixers,
I’ve applied for, and received, my commit bit! The manual says to send a
signed email to say so, so that’s what I’m doing.
By way of introductions: I’ve been using Linux since around 1995, when I
installed Slackware off floppy disks I mad
On 2024-12-31 4:39 PM, Hilton Chain wrote:
Hi Guix,
Zig 0.13.0 is now available in master!
It's worth mentioning that some build steps can be used in shell as well:
Reusing packaged dependencies with `unpack-dependencies' from
`(guix build zig-build-system)':
--8<---cut here---
On 2024-11-28 16:27, John Kehayias wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 09:29 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Welcome on board, Ekaitz! Your contributions and commitment have
already had a great impact on Guix, so that was long overdue!
Ludo’.
Echoing the same here, welcome Ekaitz! One of those where
On 2024-11-28 09:29, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Welcome on board, Ekaitz! Your contributions and commitment have
already had a great impact on Guix, so that was long overdue!
Ludo’.
Thank you. It means a lot to me that you say that.
On 2024-11-26 16:19, Ian Eure wrote:
Hi Ekaitz,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024, at 12:25 PM, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
On 2024-11-26 13:11, Efraim Flashner wrote:
I'd like to welcome Ekaitz as our newest committer to Guix!
Ekaitz, why don't you introduce yourself again, since it's been
On 2024-11-26 13:11, Efraim Flashner wrote:
I'd like to welcome Ekaitz as our newest committer to Guix!
Ekaitz, why don't you introduce yourself again, since it's been a while
Yes!
Thanks, Efraim!
So yeah, I'm Ekaitz Zarraga, my IRC nickname is just `ekaitz`, and I&#
On 2024-11-24 13:02, Stefan wrote:
Hi Ekaitz!
Very interesting work. I'll read it with more detail tomorrow but at
the moment it feels very similar to what we did for RISC-V
Is there any obvious difference in the beginning of the chain that I'm
missing?
I use tcc-boot0 only to build the late
RISC-V (which is more or
less what live-bootstrap does):
https://github.com/ekaitz-zarraga/commencement.scm
Is there any obvious difference in the beginning of the chain that I'm
missing?
We also agreed in the RISC-V port that using musl makes everything
easier, mostly because of th
On 2024-11-01 18:03, Attila Lendvai wrote:
About GNU, the FSF and so on, I don't think we should drive our
decisions out of image or reputation. There should be only one
criterium to follow in the current situation we have: is it useful for
us or not. I don't think image really matters.
this s
Hi Steve,
I don't think the survey is very long.
We could try to answer and then share it with a note on the top that
says how long it takes, so people can decide when to fill it.
Also I like when people have space to answer, because that motivates
insightful responses. It probably goes agai
On 2024-10-28 10:53, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Ekaitz Zarraga writes:
Let's remember the FSF still pays most of our bills.
I think clarification is required here: the Guix project receives
donations, including a single very large donation. Most of these
donations were received becau
On 2024-10-27 22:31, Thompson, David wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 3:13 PM Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
Many people on this project have tried to change GNU from the inside and
are very critical with the FSF (see the https://gnu.tools/). I think
that's also a good way to do things, changing
On 2024-10-27 19:12, paul wrote:
Hi Ekaitz,
On 10/27/24 11:47, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
Hi,
On 2024-10-27 11:00, indieterminacy wrote:
> I think a useful measurement of any community is the diversity
within it.
I do think we are a pretty diverse group.
But it all comes to what you consi
Hi,
On 2024-10-27 11:00, indieterminacy wrote:
> I think a useful measurement of any community is the diversity within it.
I do think we are a pretty diverse group.
But it all comes to what you consider diverse. Some people brought this
conversation during the Guix Days, probably ignoring the
Hi Juliana,
I like some of the points you do here: we should encourage committers to
review patches, and give commit access to those that are focused on that.
On the other hand, I disagree with your message about GNU and the FSF.
First, I don't think the sentiment you describe about GNU and t
So,
On 2024-10-26 22:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
We have enough money, about 50k€ currently at the FSF plus a couple
thousand € at Guix Foundation⁰.
So we rely on the FSF for the funding, mostly.
I don't want to discuss if we want to separate ourselves from the FSF or
not, but in the end, if
Hi Christine,
I think you very well said here.
My original discussion wanted to tackle several points, some of them you
very well mention here:
- There's already people getting paid for working on Guix, and that is
not a problem at the moment but we could do it better.
- If there's any com
Hi,
We mostly agree with everything so let me focus on the points I were I'd
like to add more.
Thanks for adding your thoughts, they are really valuable.
On 2024-10-25 14:58, Thompson, David wrote:
I'd like to use this opportunity to say that the Guix project needs to
stop relying upon emai
On 2024-10-25 11:11, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Steve George writes:
One concern with supporting developers is whether it demotivates them
in the long-term: from intrinsic to extrinisic motivation. Basically,
the answer is that pay doesn't motivate but it does 'enable' for
committed contributors: t
Hi,
Recently I've been discussing with other members of the Guix community
about several things we consider we could be improved.
The most important one in my opinion is the funding. I don't know (does
anybody know?) how Guix is funded, and it worries me.
I've been funded to work on the boo
Hi,
On 2024-09-26 23:13, Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the
GNU System distribution. wrote:
Hi,
A piece of software of mine using the guile-build-system runs tests
after the 'install' phase. A recent system update failed because there
is no such phase.
Looking at the Guix sour
On 2024-09-13 19:33, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have been searching for a while, without much success, so I am trying
to tap into your collective wisdom: What's the search path used by
search-patches?
More precisely, where do I have to put patches
1. In a channel?
2. In a directory
Hi
On 2024-08-31 15:44, Jan Wielkiewicz wrote:
I apologize for my emotional and not constructive reply at first, I'll
try making more constructive replies next time.
No, don't worry about it. It is a normal reaction and I'm glad you
started there because we were able to create something from
Hi,
On 2024-08-31 14:05, Jan Wielkiewicz wrote:
Hello again,
On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 01:45:04 +0200
Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
Hi Jan,
First, there are tags in the issue system:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/search?query=tag%3Aeasy
Missed this completely. Where is this documented?
In the
Hi Jan,
On 2024-08-31 00:35, Jan Wielkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
I feel that emails are not the best system for interacting with the
project. The issue tracker is not helpful, it's hard to find anything
there, there are no tags/labels/milestones... Sending patches also
involves using a tedious and count
On 2024-07-21 01:15, Juliana Sims wrote:
Greetings comrades,
As many of you are likely already aware, the European Union has recently
made plans to cut funding to its Next Generation Internet (NGI)
initiative which funds hundreds of FOSS projects, including many related
to Guix itself. The c
We can help a little if you like.
Ping me if you need something.
On 2024-07-03 19:46, Tobias Alexandra Platen wrote:
I am currently reading the documentation of GNU Mes, and have
been thinking of doing a port to PowerPC / POWER ISA.
https://www.gnu.org/software/mes/manual/mes.html#Porting-GNU-M
have
reported it upstream. We should use Gash once the issue is fixed.
Also, we only made the path until a modern GCC, not all the rest of it,
that we should be able to reuse from the current `commencement.scm` module.
This is the link to the repo:
https://github.com/ekaitz-zarraga/commencemen
Hi,
On 2024-06-24 11:31, raingl...@riseup.net wrote:
Since the email based workflow has put off quite a few potential
contributors, maybe this could be a good distributed alternative:
https://github.com/google/git-appraise
Disclaimer: haven't tried it myself, also haven't tried packaging it.
Th
Hi,
On 2024-06-20 22:54, Andreas Enge wrote:
Am Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 07:42:44PM +0100 schrieb Dale Mellor:
I'm sure guix lint tried to push my code out to them the last time I tried.
Ah indeed, there is this in guix/lint.scm:
(define (check-archival package)
"Check whether PACKAGE's sourc
Hi,
On 2024-06-20 08:36, MSavoritias wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:46:08 +0200
Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
On 2024-06-19 12:25, raingl...@riseup.net wrote:
On 2024-06-19 11:54, Efraim Flashner wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 12:13:38PM +0300, MSavoritias wrote:
...
One of our packages, dbxfs
On 2024-06-19 12:25, raingl...@riseup.net wrote:
On 2024-06-19 11:54, Efraim Flashner wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 12:13:38PM +0300, MSavoritias wrote:
...
One of our packages, dbxfs, left Github a while ago and continued
development on a different forge. They adjusted their README to disallow
Hi,
On 2024-06-05 18:51, Tobias Alexandra Platen wrote:
Since the version included in Debian is too old, I am using kicad
packaged via guix on my Talos II. This seems to work well, except that
OpenGL is using software rendering. I was able to open my old
design of my lighthouse project. Next I w
On 2024-06-04 10:19, Steve George wrote:
Hi,
We're looking for speakers - of any level - to give talks at the Guix online
meetup. We're a small, friendly group at all levels of experience. Talks can be
about anything Guix associated, for example:
- Experiences using or learning Guix
- Particu
Hi,
and everybody is reading.
This is a steep claim! I agree that nobody reads generated files in
a release tarball, but I am not sure how many other files are actually
read.
Yea, it is. I'd also love to know how effective is the reading in a
release tarball vs a VCS repo. Quality of the re
Hi,
On 2024-04-11 14:43, Andreas Enge wrote:
Hello,
Am Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 03:57:20PM +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
I think we should gradually move to building everything from
source—i.e., fetching code from VCS and adding Autoconf & co. as inputs.
the big drawback of this approach is tha
Hi,
I just want to add some perspective from the bootstrapping.
On 2024-04-04 21:48, Attila Lendvai wrote:
all in all, just by following my gut insctincts, i was advodating for building
everything from git even before the exposure of this backdoor. in fact, i found
it surprising as a guix ne
Hi all,
Yes, I proposed the project because that was something I wanted to do
myself, but I didn't have the time for.
As Ludo suggests, start getting familiar with Guix's codebase and usage.
I can help you with contribution later.
When digging on the code, this talk by Josselin Poiret is ve
Hi,
What are you implying with the "loud" minority here?
MSavoritias
He's probably talking about the same thing that made you continue being
heated after the fact you were told to calm down and you are not wasting
any single opportunity to continue answering every single email in this
thr
Hi Ada,
On 2024-03-17 07:18, Ada Stevenson wrote:
Hi Guix,
I have this gripe with usability regarding using substitutes.
Sometimes, usually when I'm on an enterprise network like my
university's of library's wifi, the `guix substitute` process dies with
a "TLS error in procedure 'write_to_se
I have an idea too, but I don't have the knowledge to mentor it.
guix pack support for AppImages.
On 2024-03-04 20:10, Gábor Boskovits wrote:
Hello guix,
I coordinated with the GNU org admins, and we can still do this round,
but we have to go fast to make this happen. I have already taken the
Hi,
On 2024-03-02 22:16, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
Hi,
I found an old and unfinished patch in my pile. It optimizes building
with cmake by not building the test if "#:tests?" is false. (Basically
it passes -DBUILD_TESTING=OFF/ON" depending on "#:tests?".)
Is this of interest? Then I would take
On 2023-12-29 04:58, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
Hi,
Apoorv via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
writes:
I want to make a suggestion for a feature for guix shell.
I was recently writing guix.scm files for my projects and was having
problem with the libraries I added, not
On 2023-12-20 21:28, Attila Lendvai wrote:
dear Guix,
i'm trying to compile something to a raspberry rp2040 microcontroller
(https://codeberg.org/Riku_V/pico-serprog).
$ guix shell gcc-toolchain cmake make pkg-config -e "((@ (gnu packages embedded)
make-arm-none-eabi-toolchain-7-2018-q2-up
Hi
I want to forward this message to guix-devel because it is a clear case of some
(actually good) technical decision affecting users in unexpected ways.
Now, after the change, a user might run `guix search avr-toolchain` and find
nothing. Same for ARM.
This is a shame, because we have tool
Thank you all for the collaboration!
ElenQ Technology
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, October 4th, 2023 at 20:51, Efraim Flashner
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 06:47:51PM +0000, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
>
> > --- Original Message ---
> > On Wednesday, October 4th, 2023 at 18:3
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, October 4th, 2023 at 18:35, Efraim Flashner
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 06:15:53PM +0000, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
>
> > --- Original Message ---
> > On Wednesday, October 4th, 2023 at 16:18, Efraim Flashner
> &g
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, October 4th, 2023 at 16:18, Efraim Flashner
wrote:
> I think we can mention guix.vim also
Certainly, do you want to add it yourself?
Nobody is going to explain it better than you.
:)
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, October 4th, 2023 at 15:27, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ekaitz Zarraga eka...@elenq.tech skribis:
>
> > From 0c2be98f05bb288699a8e39dcef6428eb5a9dc3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > Message-ID:
> > 0c2be98f05
Hi Simon
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, September 25th, 2023 at 20:58, Simon Tournier
wrote:
> Hi Ekaitz,
>
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 at 14:25, Ekaitz Zarraga eka...@elenq.tech wrote:
>
> > I decided to go for the action instead of discussion.
>
>
>
Message-ID: <40e5d840cf497a4313f33ce5fad7ecbea081f6ba.1695651517.git.eka...@elenq.tech>
From: Ekaitz Zarraga
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:16:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] WIP: doc: contributing: Add alternative setups section
Start with Guile Studio and Vim/NeoVim.
* doc/contributing.texi (Alternat
> I think a lot of this discussion is stuck on what is better web or
> email. Where it doesn't have to be.
>
> What we instead need to do is acknowledge that some people like the web
> approach.
>
> And accommodate them so we can have guix used by more people. Simple as that
> :D
Exactly.
An
Hi,
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 05:45:41PM +0000, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
>
> > I use protonmail and they don't provide smtp access so I can't do git
> > send-mail as easy as other people do.
>
>
> A mail provider not allowing SMTP is a git forge that d
Hi,
On Wednesday, September 13th, 2023 at 3:42 PM, Maxim Cournoyer
wrote:
>
> There's no lock-in. You can use any tool you want. Most people hacking
> on Guix do so with Emacs and Geiser because these are currently the best
> tools (that I know of) to do the job; these are the tools many of us
> > also not as obvious (you search for lines added or removed or changed,
> > not easy language such as 'gnu: package-name: Add').
>
>
>
> i'm pretty sure that the source of the annoyance is not the strict format in
> the summary line, but the formal details in the commit message body.
Yes
> > This is what I mean when I say many times emacs is kind of mandatory,
> > and
> > this thread is kind of a demonstration of what I meant because the main
> > discussion evolved to: you can use this or that in emacs to ease the
> > dev
> > experience.
>
>
> One of the benefits of my being ab
Hi,
> I think this is the biggest hurdle. A lot of folks are using gmail and
> its web based UI and it is just plain awful. I have made the switch to
> using neomutt (and isync + notmuch + mstmp) and it has made emails a joy
> to use and work with.
I use protonmail and they don't provide smtp acc
ElenQ Technology
Ethical Innovation
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, August 28th, 2023 at 11:04 AM, 宋文武 wrote:
> Ekaitz Zarraga eka...@elenq.tech writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As you might know I'm talking part on the RISC-V bootstrapping efforts
Hi all,
As you might know I'm talking part on the RISC-V bootstrapping efforts in Guix.
This makes me need a multi-architecture GDB. So I made this simple package:
``` scheme
(define-module (gdb)
#:use-module (gnu packages)
#:use-module (gnu packages gdb)
#:use-module ((guix licenses) #:sel
Hi,
> This definitely falls into the IDE tooling issue that I complained about
> a bunch of times. There seems to be a reality distortion field around
> Lisp that makes some users believe that s-expressions automatically lead
> to a good IDE experience. And yet, Java IDEs have had automatic import
0:00:00 2001
Message-Id:
<308b67848e93a25f627dd64e024e9a501979a157.1689368739.git.eka...@elenq.tech>
From: Ekaitz Zarraga
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 22:52:59 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add hare
* gnu/packages/hare.scm (hare, harec): New variable.
* gnu/local.mk: Add hare.scm
---
gnu/local.mk | 2 +
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, June 21st, 2023 at 3:43 PM, Felix Lechner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I declared Bug#60889, [1] which provides a Zig build system, as a
> prerequisite for Bug#64208. [2] The latter packages two Zig
> applications that use the build system in the former.
>
>
Felicidades!
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, May 16th, 2023 at 2:28 AM, jgart wrote:
> Hi Guixers,
>
> Thanks for granting me commit access. I'm looking forward to helping out with
> patch review, with a
> particular focus on moving patches along for the Python team.
>
> I also
Hey!
¿Qué tal?
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, March 31st, 2023 at 7:33 PM, jgart wrote:
> Hi Guixers,
>
> What is Guix's answer to PyInstaller?
>
> `guix pack --list-formats`?
>
> https://github.com/pyinstaller/pyinstaller
>
> I haven't reviewed all of PyInstaller yet to see wh
Gracias!
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, February 1st, 2023 at 3:45 PM, jgart wrote:
> hola Ekaitz,
>
> I added it as a pre-release to Guix 'R Us a few weeks ago:
>
> https://toys.whereis.みんな/symbols?search=zig-build-system
>
> ;()
Hi
> Can `zig-build-system` be an alternative to the `gnu-build-system`?
It could be, but in order to do that we need to add the zig-build-system:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/60889
:)
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, January 24th, 2023 at 2:50 AM, Csepp wrote:
> There have been countless times when I was using etc/commiter.scm and it
> commited more than it should have and then slapped an incorrect message
> on it.
> I think it would make a lot more sense if addin
> Egun on!
>
> Could you send the whole changeset to guix-patc...@gnu.org? That’ll
> make sure (1) it doesn’t get lost, and (2) it’s tested by
> https://qa.guix.gnu.org. (Use ‘git send-email’ for best results.)
Sure thing!
My email provider doesn't play well with git send-mail but I'll do it as
ell me what you think. Let's see if we can merge this
> someday.
>
> Best,
> Ekaitz
Let me add the docs tooFrom e5029028d6cf6c7b9d61081d95f09e2d735648ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ekaitz Zarraga
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 23:09:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Add zig
merge this
someday.
Best,
EkaitzFrom 5e26b25b9ed50a6c7c5e696d1fdc06e531c416d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ekaitz Zarraga
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:02:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Add a sample package for testing the zig build system
---
gnu/packages/zig.scm | 34
> Pretty sure there is already a #:go argument, but I might be misremembering.
Just took a look in the build-system and I can't find that argument.
Maybe I didn't search correctly anyway... :)
Cheers!
Hi,
> Hi Guix,
>
> I'm trying to package wakatime-cli[1], while Guix uses Go 1.17 as the
> default, the package requires
> Go 1.19 at the current version (v1.60.4).
>
> Though it's possible to package the last version supports Go 1.17 (v1.38.0),
> I wonder if we can
> adjust the build system so
Also all the flags I added I didn't add to the `gnu/build-system/zig.scm` file
because I have no idea how to do that.
Please help :)
Cheers!
he-dir" "zig-cache"
>
> What's the difference between 'zig test build.zig' and 'zig build test'?
I'll give you a really naïve answer: in my computer the second works and the
first doesn't.
> Beware of copy-pasting :). You don't us
second one for an example package that actually works but has
some weird needs you can find in the comments.
Cheers,
EkaitzFrom c19c7161cf0864be5ffee12e8baac248d2d9874a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ekaitz Zarraga
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:02:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Add a sample package for tes
Hi,
>
> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush,
> though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.
I'm one of them.
You can use what I wrote with the license you prefer.
Consider it y
Hi,
--- Original Message ---
On Saturday, August 6th, 2022 at 3:30 PM, jgart wrote:
> Hi Guixers,
>
> wdyt of having some modern TLDR entry in the cookbook for getting Guix
> neophytes up to par with texinfo?
>
> Since texinfo is the defacto markup for the GNU Guix project and we're no
Saluton,
> Egun on!
>
> Ekaitz Zarraga eka...@elenq.tech skribis:
>
> > With this patch the tcc build issue is fixed, the downside is that it's
> > set to an specific commit and not a release.
>
>
> Is it because there’s no newer release? (I can add a co
cular dependency).
I hope this is useful.
Best,
EkaitzFrom ed05cfb9356fb5b07be48c54b9ec33eab672de61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ekaitz Zarraga
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:05:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: tcc: Update to a83b28568596afd8792fd58d1a5bd157fc6b6634
* gnu/packages/c.scm (tcc): Upda
> `--development` to actually make an equivalent call. So `guix shell`, I
> guess, is more nuanced then, than `guix environment`.
>
> Anyway, that solves it, thank you!
>
> Best regards,
> Zelphir
>
> On 7/9/22 00:07, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Isn&#x
Hi,
Isn't `guix environment guix` equivalent to `guix shell -D guix`?
I think you are missing a -D there so it's adding a shell with guix and not
with its development dependencies.
Hope that helps,
Ekaitz
[ElenQ Technology](https://elenq.tech)
Ethical Innovation
--- Original Message ---
Also, hi!
We kinda have a working bootstrappable GCC.
If you want to know more you can read here:
https://ekaitz.elenq.tech/bootstrapGcc4.html
:)
> Hi Guix,
>
> this is not a new idea[1]: let’s add a page to the website that lists teams
> and a mail alias for each of the teams.
>
> For example, the “R team” consists of people familiar with how R
> packaging works in Guix, e.g. Simon and myself. There would be an alias
> “guix-tea...@gnu.org”
Hi
--- Original Message ---
On Sunday, May 22nd, 2022 at 3:49 PM, Théo Maxime Tyburn
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Ekaitz Zarraga eka...@elenq.tech writes:
>
> > Make sure the version of alembic we have packaged is the one Blender
> > expects.
> >
> > Sometimes
Hi
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, May 20th, 2022 at 11:36 PM, Théo Maxime Tyburn
wrote:
> I added ("alembic" ,alembic) to the inputs
> and "-DWITH_ALEMBIC=ON" in the configure-flags list.
>
> Unfortunately it didn’t work directly. I get this error from ld
> --8<---cut
Good idea, I will!
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, March 30th, 2022 at 9:40 PM, Reza Housseini
wrote:
> Did you try to use guix time-machine and compile 4.7 from there? Perhaps
>
> the issue is the glibc version?
>
> On 3/30/22 21:32, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote
Hi Reza,
On Wednesday, March 30th, 2022 at 9:27 PM, Reza Housseini
wrote:
> Looks like a bug in gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81712
>
> You probably have to patch gcc 4.* as it was only backported until gcc 5.5
>
> On 3/29/22 21:01, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote:
> And you try to compile that using `guix build -m manifest.scm` the
> compilation fails. The same happens when choosing 4.8.
More specifically I mean the output of that command is:
./md-unwind-support.h:60:47: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
...
error: in phase 'build': uncau
> Hi Ekaitz
>
> Not that I am in any position to answer the question, but could you
>
> share a little bit more context?
>
> Did the error occur when you were compiling gcc-4.7 or do programs
>
> compiled with this compiler have this issue?
>
> What path led you to gcc-4.7? Can you share your com
Hi,
I'm digging on old compiler versions for bootstrapping purposes and I realized
that gcc 4.7 and 4.8 packages don't compile on x64.
We have been able to reproduce the failure of gcc 4.7 but we didn't test the
4.8 error that far.
In gcc-4.7 the error is the following:
./md-unwind-support.h:
Hi,
Thanks for the decision you have taken here, it was a difficult one.
>From my side I want to publicly apologize to those who thought
(very accurately) my tone was harsh.
That being said, it looks like we reached some understanding
together and that's a reason for celebration.
I hope we keep
Just to keep it clear, Taylan,
You didn't in any case listen to what I actually said which
was that you are forcing us to have this debate. You don't
care if we want or we don't.
I don't want to have this discussion and you are still
pushing.
I never said you were wrong or not, just wanted you t
I'll just add my five cents here and leave the conversation:
> Reading over my mails, I just don't understand why they might have been
> misunderstood so badly. If you could shed some light on that, I would be
> very grateful! It would certainly help me avoid mistakes in the future,
> if I were to
> I suspect you haven't properly read any of my mails and jumped to conclusions
> based on a quick skim, or something like that.
Well, I've been reading them and some people told you to stop and you still
continue. People already told you were bothering them.
Even if your tone was respectful (i
Thinking about it from the perspective of people that want to join the project
and are not potential harassers makes more sense.
They will feel their problems are understood.
Thanks for elaborating with that beautiful quote. It makes total sense.
Ekaitz
> Ekaitz Zarraga eka...@elenq.tech writes:
>
> > I was updating mesa, see #54066.
>
> Give the build farm some time and it will build things for you.
> Nobody else is expected to build all the packages you mentioned.
But I wanted to use it in my machine anyway.
> >
I have a weird question about this that might be a little bit offtopic.
Why should we specify reasons? It's like we are saying some reasons are more
important than others.
Is it not ok with...
> our project and our community a harassment-free experience for everyone.
?
That should cover every
> On purpose? We have binaries for blender:
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=blender
>
I was updating mesa, see #54066.
> PS: I don’t take the bait :)
But think about it, that makes Guix unusable when running
on battery for instance. Making a Guix pull is unpredictable too...
I unders
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
