> I hope this can help other people faced with an unmerged fix to a
> pressing issue.
Thank you for direct hint on how to fix offlineimap!
The issue even with the latest commit still happens, when using
pythonfile = <...>
option in .offlineimaprc to provide additional custom python functions
for
Hi!
I'm trying to package a more recent nightly version of openscad[0] with
this package definition[1].
Even though I use =(recursive? #t)= within =(git-reference)=, the
submodule directories in the build directory (e.g.
=/tmp/guix-build-openscad-nightly--2025.04.28.535d96f.drv-5/source/libr
Hi Efraim,
On Thu, May 01 2025, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> gnutls wasn't a drop-in replacement
wolfSSL could be such a "drop-in" replacement. [1] Their OpenSSL
compatibility layer became popular when OpenSSL lost their FIPS rating
for a little while, but I ported software to it long before.
wolfS
>jeu. 01 mai 2025 at 12:30, Andreas Enge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 11:02:08PM +0200 schrieb Noé Lopez:
>> As far as I know its accepted that packages are updated to versions
>> beyond their current release in Guix. Especially if they don’t work
>> without that version. See “inf
So the full list is the following:
export
SKIP_PACKAGES=cedille:emacs-emms-print-metadata:emacs-emms:emacs-jedi:emacs-flycheck-haskell:emacs-explain-pause-mode:emacs-realgud:emacs-emms-mode-line-cycle:emacs-helm-emms:emacs-org-emms:emacs-keystore-mode:emacs-prodigy-el:emacs-webfeeder:emacs-magit-
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 10:09:33AM -0400, Greg Hogan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 4:38 AM Z572 wrote:
> >
> > see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094969
>
> Should we follow Debian's lead and close this bug?
I followed the debian bug at the time and I checked our version o
Hello,
On Wed, 2025-04-23 at 11:10 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix,
>
> It’s been two months since we started discussing GCD 002, entitled
> “Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg”. Its final
> version is attached below.
>
> In accordance with the GCD process, team
Hello,
Am Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 11:02:08PM +0200 schrieb Noé Lopez:
> As far as I know its accepted that packages are updated to versions
> beyond their current release in Guix. Especially if they don’t work
> without that version. See “info '(guix) Version Numbers'”.
this is true, especially for
For the record, to help readers of the mailing list navigate the package
transformations syntax, here is what I did when faced with this bug:
replaced offlineimap in my home-configuration.scm with:
((options->transformation
(list `(with-patch . "offlineimap3=patches/offlineimap3.patch")
I support
--
(Life is like a pencil that will surely run out,
but will leave the beautiful writing of life)
(D4F09EB110177E03C28E2FE1F5BBAE1E0392253F
(hkp://keys.openpgp.org))
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Ryan,
On 24/04/2025 2:19 pm, Ryan Schanzenbacher wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently updating the Nix package since some flakes are beginning to
break with the current 2.16.1 we have in the repo. I have updated
everything
locally and have been dogfooding it, seems to work good with no
regressio
I support
--
Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
i often see a few lines (0-10) of orphaned inodes and stuff like that. nothing
dramatic, and certainly nothing that demands user feedback.
but i think the `recovering journal` part is an unambigous indication that the
fs was not cleanly unmounted.
To throw my hat into the ring with this,, I c
Le Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:10:50 +0200,
Ludovic Courtès a écrit :
> Hello Guix,
>
> It’s been two months since we started discussing GCD 002, entitled
> “Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg”. Its final
> version is attached below.
>
> In accordance with the GCD process, team me
Hi all,
I am currently updating the Nix package since some flakes are beginning to
break with the current 2.16.1 we have in the repo. I have updated everything
locally and have been dogfooding it, seems to work good with no regressions.
Just wondering what the consensus is on what branch I shoul
15 matches
Mail list logo
