Hi Attila,
Attila Lendvai writes:
> if at boot i see `root: recovering journal` printed, does that mean that i'm
> also affected?
Sort of. If you always see just recovering journal, there is probably nothing
to worry about, because the sync seems to be taking place.
>
> it was after a plain
On 24.04.25 00:24, Noé Lopez wrote:
"nomike (they/them)" writes:
Hi nomike!
Thanks for your efforts, here are my thoughts but please note that I am
not too experienced with Guix so feel free to disagree and make sure to
doubt!
Hi Noé!
I appreciate you stepping in here. I started using guix a
The more I think about it the more it seems we should re-enter our
initramfs on shutdown. Unfortunately, the Linux kernel frees it when
switching to the real root fs. Not sure how to get Linux to find it again
(or how to get Linux to not free it in the first place) and to pivot_root
to it again (
"nomike (they/them)" writes:
> Hi!
>
> prusa-slicer is currently at versionb 2.7.4 in guix which is
> ridiculously outdated.
> I'm currently working on upgrading it to the latest version 2.9.2 and
> I've already made quite some progress, but it looks like I'm stuck right
> before the finish li
Hi Ludo,
>It’s the ‘net-base’ package—see ‘operating-system-etc-service’.
Thanks!
>> Thanks. I found it--and it syncs *before* unmounting. Why?
>In case umount(2) fails.
That makes sense.
I've read through the relevant parts of the Linux kernel and it seems
like this: the buffer cache (which
Gary Johnson writes:
> Hi Guix,
>
> The offlineimap3 package is broken in the current version of Guix due
> to a longstanding bug in offlineimap3 that makes it incompatible with
> Python 3.11 (which is now the default python version in Guix).
>
> For reference, my current Guix version is:
>
> g
Hi!
prusa-slicer is currently at versionb 2.7.4 in guix which is
ridiculously outdated.
I'm currently working on upgrading it to the latest version 2.9.2 and
I've already made quite some progress, but it looks like I'm stuck right
before the finish line.
prusa-slicer is using cmake and the u
Hi Guix,
The offlineimap3 package is broken in the current version of Guix due
to a longstanding bug in offlineimap3 that makes it incompatible with
Python 3.11 (which is now the default python version in Guix).
For reference, my current Guix version is:
guix 9fbe196
repository URL: https:
On 2025-04-23, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> It’s been two months since we started discussing GCD 002, entitled
> “Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg”. Its final
> version is attached below.
>
> In accordance with the GCD process, team members have until May 6th to
> participate in
Am 23.04.25 um 11:10 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
It’s been two months since we started discussing GCD 002, entitled
“Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg”. Its final
version is attached below.
In accordance with the GCD process, team members have until May 6th to
participate in
Hi,
I disapprove the current state of the GCD; although I sponsor the GCD
and I think renaming from master to main is the right direction.
IMHO, the section Motivations would require a complete revamp and
technical bits need more adjustments.
I hope we will be able to revisit this proposal in th
Hi,
I accept.
Cheers,
simon
Hi Vagrant, all,
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 at 11:58, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> The nature of (at least some of) those responses were largely a negation
> that left little room to discuss how to move forward, which left me at
> an impass as to how to even continue the discussion.
>
> Only in retrospec
I support.
On 23 April 2025 09:10:50 GMT, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
>Hello Guix,
>
>It’s been two months since we started discussing GCD 002, entitled
>“Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg”. Its final
>version is attached below.
>
>In accordance with the GCD process, team memb
Hi Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I'll be mostly away from computers from June until the end of October.
> Concretely, this will have the following effects:
>
> - no work on R or bioinformatics packages
> - no reviews or responses to requests for mentoring
> - no work on the guix
Hi,
> As last time, I found what is probably another unhandled case in the
> toml parser, while trying to build python-scikit-learn@1.6.1.
> It fails to parse:
sorry about that, a patch is available in #78013, but beware that it’s
a world rebuild.
Cheers,
Lars
Hi,
Andreas Enge writes:
> Am Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 01:38:39PM -0700 schrieb Felix Lechner via
> Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.:
>> I turned the messages off again, as I did not wish to make enemies.
>
> Ah, that is a pity. Today I have done a lot of work on bugs and was
Hi,
"Matthew Todd" writes:
> Hi Guix, Christoph,
>
> I can confirm that the patch Christoph links upthread
> (https://issues.guix.gnu.org/77154) fixes the problem I ran into.
>
>
> Test steps:
> * Create custom libssh2-1.11.1 package, that inherits Guix channel libssh2
> and applies Christoph's
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 5:11 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> Hello Guix,
>
> It’s been two months since we started discussing GCD 002, entitled
> “Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg”. Its final
> version is attached below.
>
> In accordance with the GCD process, team members ha
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 22:07:14 +0800,
Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
>
> Hi Guix,
>
> as the date for the GCD 003 was set to February 18th, the discussion
> period actually ended on Saturday already. I have incorporated some
> changes on Sunday to realign the proposal with GCD 002 (the Codeberg
> one)
On 2025-04-23 11:10, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix,
>
> It’s been two months since we started discussing GCD 002, entitled
> “Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg”. Its final
> version is attached below.
>
> In accordance with the GCD process, team members have until May
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:10:50 +0800,
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> [1.1 ]
> Hello Guix,
>
> It’s been two months since we started discussing GCD 002, entitled
> “Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg”. Its final
> version is attached below.
>
> In accordance with the GCD pro
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Guix,
>
> It’s been two months since we started discussing GCD 002, entitled
> “Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg”. Its final
> version is attached below.
>
> In accordance with the GCD process, team members have until May 6th to
> participat
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Guix,
>
> It’s been two months since we started discussing GCD 002, entitled
> “Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg”. Its final
> version is attached below.
>
> In accordance with the GCD process, team members have until May 6th to
> participat
24 matches
Mail list logo
