Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers

2025-02-07 Thread 45mg
Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." writes: > In my view, running forks is a strength for Guix. I will soon propose a > way to do it with authenticated commits. Oooh. Would this be similar in scope or design to my current implementation [1]? If it is, I

Re: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

2025-02-07 Thread Ekaitz Zarraga
On 2025-02-07 23:14, Hartmut Goebel wrote: Am 01.02.25 um 13:37 schrieb Tomas Volf: Depends, I host my email at VPSFree.cz, which is (roughly speaking) a non-profit, where I do not pay a subscription, but a membership fee. And I get full voting rights, per the applicable Czech laws for this type

Re: [GCD] Migrating repositories, issues, and patches to Codeberg

2025-02-07 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Am 01.02.25 um 13:37 schrieb Tomas Volf: Depends, I host my email at VPSFree.cz, which is (roughly speaking) a non-profit, where I do not pay a subscription, but a membership fee. And I get full voting rights, per the applicable Czech laws for this type of non-profit. So if I would not like some

Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers

2025-02-07 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi Janneke, On Fri, Feb 07 2025, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > It was about 'tens of thousands' of forks. Without a 'stable' branch (or other quality control) that is the level of forking we are looking at. I have to modify the HEAD for Guix to work locally about a third of the time. In my vi

Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers

2025-02-07 Thread Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: > How did the ‘thousands of forks’ question come to be? It was about 'tens of thousands' of forks. We were talking about size and bandwith. > Is is about humans deciding to store their personal guix clone on > Codeberg? Yes. > Possibly because (like GitHub) this

Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers

2025-02-07 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
…and probably not, but has the subject of a ‘git.guix.gnu.org’ delegation come up (which would require some coöperation from the host for HTTPS)? I'm in favour of this Big Migration but it would be nice to anticipate the next one. Kind regards, T G-R Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevi

Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers

2025-02-07 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Hi Ludo', Thanks to everyone (Guix and Codeberg) who took the time to discuss this IRL. How did the ‘thousands of forks’ question come to be? Is is about humans deciding to store their personal guix clone on Codeberg? Possibly because (like GitHub) this is encouraged by the Web UI workflow? O

Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers

2025-02-07 Thread Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: Hello, > Following the Guix Days discussion on the (pre-)GCD about migrating to > Codeberg, some of us went to the Codeberg booth at FOSDEM to chat with > them. They were nice and took the time to answer our many questions, > despite all this happening in an overcrowded a

Re: Discussion with Codeberg volunteers

2025-02-07 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Hello, On Fri, Feb 7, 2025, 4:22 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guix, > > Following the Guix Days discussion on the (pre-)GCD about migrating to > Codeberg, some of us went to the Codeberg booth at FOSDEM to chat with > them. They were nice and took the time to answer our many questions, > d

Discussion with Codeberg volunteers

2025-02-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Guix, Following the Guix Days discussion on the (pre-)GCD about migrating to Codeberg, some of us went to the Codeberg booth at FOSDEM to chat with them. They were nice and took the time to answer our many questions, despite all this happening in an overcrowded and noisy environment. :-)

Re: bug#74736: [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process.

2025-02-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Divya, Divya Ranjan skribis: > Glad that we've finalized the GCD! Really happy to see it. But is it that > you've missed my "I support" or that my name is not there in /etc/teams.scm? > I just did a search in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/74736 and found that I had > sent a "I support" on

Re: Guix Consensus Document process ratified!

2025-02-07 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 10:34:38PM +, Divya Ranjan wrote: > Hello Ludo, > > Glad that we've finalized the GCD! Really happy to see it. But is it that > you've missed my "I support" or that my name is not there in /etc/teams.scm? > I just did a search in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/74736 and