Re: GNU Manuals in Info/HTML format via Guix?

Luis Felipe writes: > On 10/01/25 15:13, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> Björn Bidar writes: >> >>> Rostislav Svoboda writes: >>> > Following a discussion on emacs-devel, several people suggested that > GNU Guix may be a a good way to contemplate this distribution mechanism, > for obvious

Re: On a Guile-based Build-Tool complimenting Guix

Hello Divya, apologies for the late response. On 12/28/24 02:55, Divya Ranjan wrote: While I haven't looked Nicholas' patches carefully, how do you think we could use Guix's build-system functionality as it stands now for a proper build system? Well. I see it the other way around. Guix is th

Re: Thoughtful updates to TexLive

Hello, Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." writes: > Thanks for that analysis! I had the innocuous-looking 'texlive' in my > Guix Home profile. That package pulls in texlivetexmf-${date}. [1] Was > that my error? No, it wasn’t. The `texlive' package is

Re: GNU Manuals in Info/HTML format via Guix?

On 10/01/25 15:13, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: Björn Bidar writes: Rostislav Svoboda writes: Following a discussion on emacs-devel, several people suggested that GNU Guix may be a a good way to contemplate this distribution mechanism, for obvious GNU-related reasons. As a side note, at the Guix

Re: GNU Manuals in Info/HTML format via Guix?

Björn Bidar writes: > Rostislav Svoboda writes: > >>> Following a discussion on emacs-devel, several people suggested that >>> GNU Guix may be a a good way to contemplate this distribution mechanism, >>> for obvious GNU-related reasons. >> >> As a side note, at the Guix Days Fringe of FOSSDEM al

Re: Thoughtful updates to TexLive

Hi Nicolas, On Fri, Jan 10 2025, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > don’t need every package in there Thanks for that analysis! I had the innocuous-looking 'texlive' in my Guix Home profile. That package pulls in texlivetexmf-${date}. [1] Was that my error? Kind regards Felix P.S. After a good night's

Re: GNU Manuals in Info/HTML format via Guix?

Rostislav Svoboda writes: >> Following a discussion on emacs-devel, several people suggested that >> GNU Guix may be a a good way to contemplate this distribution mechanism, >> for obvious GNU-related reasons. > > As a side note, at the Guix Days Fringe of FOSSDEM almost a year ago, > we had a se

Guix Common Document process (v7) (was: Request-For-Comment, RFC)

Hi all, On Tue, 07 Jan 2025 at 11:40, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> The submission is: . > > And now v6! https://issues.guix.gnu.org/74736#27 See v7: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/74736#44 > Even better if we can finalize before Guix Days so: > > discussion pe