Hi Attila,
Attila Lendvai writes:
> is there a way to make `guix system image` work from a guix checkout that
> contains unauthorized commits?
>
> or is there an equivalent of channel intro commits in this context?
>
> or something else?
I believe you would have to follow a similar process as
> > ./pre-inst-env guix system image --system=armhf-linux [...]
>
> Why using armhf instead of aarch64 for the BPI-R4 ?
because i'm not there yet. this is my very first such endeavor.
i'm merely trying to reproduce something that i've found in a mail archive:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html
Hello,
Not about your commit authentication problem.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 9:28 PM Attila Lendvai wrote:
> add BPI-R4 support
> [...]
> ./pre-inst-env guix system image --system=armhf-linux [...]
Why using armhf instead of aarch64 for the BPI-R4 ?
--
Vincent Legoll
dear Guix,
i'm trying to generate a guix image from my modified guix checkout. this is a
baby step towards my ultimate goal, to add BPI-R4 support.
./pre-inst-env guix system image --system=armhf-linux -e '(begin (use-modules
(gnu system) (gnu bootloader) (gnu bootloader u-boot) (gnu system ins
Hi,
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 11:38, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Good point. In practice we’re already doing a combination of the above
> and I agree that there are probably advantages to keep it that way.
Well, from my perspective, the question is architecture per
architecture. I mean, I think it’
Hi,
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 12:26, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> These things require constant attention.
Thank you for such attention! Thanks Chris for playing the role of
“database administrator”. :-)
Well, it reminds me that our discussion [1] “Sustainable funding and
maintenance for our infrast
