Hi,
Andreas Enge writes:
> Hello,
>
> currently I cannot reconfigure my laptop with the Xfce desktop environment
> due to mutter not building:
> Ok: 166
> Expected Fail: 5
> Fail: 1
> Unexpected Pass:0
> Skipped:0
> Timeout:0
> (this
Hi,
I've pushed update togather with https://issues.guix.gnu.org/71480. It
fixed the build, check and sanity check phases in
ce98c3436c57e7b366a3ec06c47a7e8919c990fb.
Thanks,
Oleg
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 at 11:02, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote:
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> It looks like updating to 1.0.0 has n
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 3:47 PM Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> This may be a little wild, but what are the downsides to doing some
> combination of all of the above?
>
> A mixed strategy could reduce ... the upfront cost of buying and hosting
> hardware (#1), the ongoing costs of renting (#2),
There are now cases of packages linking to Systemd, not just checking
for installing init scripts.
should these be considered bugs of such packages (and we shall ask the
package authors to make systemd optional)?
On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 4:45 AM Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Andy Tai writes:
>
> > Som
Hi Guix
If you are looking for host services
I have good experience with netcup.de. They also have ARM machines.
My 3 machines have a great uptime
Bye
Enno
> Am 2024/07/08 um 18:28 schrieb Efraim Flashner :
>
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 04:24:06PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hello Guix!
>>
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 04:24:06PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> We (Andreas, Chris, Ricardo, Romain, and myself) were having a
> discussion about what it would take to set up a build farm similar to
> what’s behind ci.guix: roughly 30 x86_64 servers, with 32-core/64-thread
> CPU
On 2024-07-02, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> We (Andreas, Chris, Ricardo, Romain, and myself) were having a
> discussion about what it would take to set up a build farm similar to
> what’s behind ci.guix: roughly 30 x86_64 servers, with 32-core/64-thread
> CPUs and 128 GiB of RAM. The reason for this d
Hi Simon,
> On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 at 16:24, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> The reason for this discussion is that we were
>> thinking that we should not take our existing build farms for granted
>> and be prepared for the future.
>
> Could you explain the rationale? I unders
Andy Tai writes:
> Some packages require systemd;
Some of these packages are perfectly happy with elogind. Others only
check to decide what files to install (systemd unit files or those for
another init system).
--
Ricardo
