Re: doc: installation: fix ~root confusion (was Re: doc: Removing much of Binary Installation)

Hi vagrant, On Sunday, March 10th, 2024 at 9:58 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > > On 2024-03-10, Suhail Singh wrote: > > > Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org writes: > > > > > but "guix pull" does not update the running guix-daemon; > > > > Just to be clear, however, if one were to do

Re: doc: installation: fix ~root confusion (was Re: doc: Removing much of Binary Installation)

On 2024-03-10, Suhail Singh wrote: > Vagrant Cascadian writes: >> but "guix pull" does not update the running guix-daemon; > > Just to be clear, however, if one were to do =sudo -i guix pull= > instead, followed by =systemctl restart guix-daemon.service= it /would/ > update the running guix-daemon

Re: doc: installation: fix ~root confusion (was Re: doc: Removing much of Binary Installation)

Vagrant Cascadian writes: > but "guix pull" does not update the running guix-daemon; Just to be clear, however, if one were to do =sudo -i guix pull= instead, followed by =systemctl restart guix-daemon.service= it /would/ update the running guix-daemon on Debian, correct? Or is that not the cas

Re: doc: installation: fix ~root confusion (was Re: doc: Removing much of Binary Installation)

On 2024-03-10, m...@excalamus.com wrote: > On Wed, 06 Mar 2024 22:29:23 +0100 Vagrant Cascadian wrote --- >> As the one who packaged and maintains guix in Debian... > > Thank you for doing this work! > >> The guix-daemon should continue to work from the packaged version, although >> as guix

doc: installation: fix ~root confusion (was Re: doc: Removing much of Binary Installation)

I realigned the subject. It was previously changed to "doc: Removing much of Binary Installation" which is misleading. The topic is how to clarify installation based on reported confusion, not about removing text. The reported confusion was on the use of '~root'. Explicit mention of '~root'

Re: G-exps: thunk instead of top-level references?

Hi Hartmut, Hartmut Goebel writes: > Hi Ludio, > > I'd like to get some advice: > > In commit 84c3aafb5a18ad278bbb36df7b70849fe05789c8 "trytond: Avoid top-level > references to other modules" > your turned a top-level variable which defines into a thunk: > >