Hello,
I’ve been following along with this discussion, as well as a
discussion on Clojureverse, and thought it might be helpful to
pull together some threads and design decisions around Clojure’s
behavior.
Clojure is designed to ship libraries as source artifacts, not
bytecode ("pretty much
Hello,
宋文武 writes:
[...]
> Hello, I have just pushed 2 commits to remove qt.scm from the scope of
> lxqt and add myself to the qt team.
>
> Happy weekend!
Yay! Thank you, and happy weekend to you as well!
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Hi,
On Fri, 08 Mar 2024 19:05:57 +0800,
Andreas Enge wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Am Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 08:46:12PM -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> > I think the reason qt.scm is part of the lxqt team is historical; lxqt-team
> > predates qt-team. We should probably just remove qt.scm from
> > lxqt-te
Hi Fabio,
Fabio Natali writes:
> On 2024-03-03, 17:42 +0100, Josselin Poiret wrote:
>> From: Josselin Poiret
>>
>> * gnu/packages/bootloaders.scm (grub-minimal, grub-coreboot, grub-efi32,
>> grub-hybrid): Use G-Exps.
>> (grub-efi): Use G-Exps. Also use OVMF to test.
>
> Hi Josselin,
>
> This
--
Giovanni Biscuolo writes:
> Hi Josselin,
>
> Josselin Poiret writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> One thing I would like to get rid of though is debbugs.
>
> given that a significant part of the Guix infrastructure is provided by
> the GNU project, including the bug/issue tracker, and I don't think that
