Re: Updates for Go

2023-08-22 Thread david larsson
On 2023-08-17 16:25, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote: [..] Even if you dislike Go, but can work your way through a package, please consider signing up! Hi, Im not a fan of Go, but I've wanted to package some Go packages. Ive only managed to write 2 packages for my private channel so far, but they

Re: Updates for Go

2023-08-22 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi Attila, On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 6:14 AM Attila Lendvai wrote: > > currently the go build system in guix does not reuse build artifacts Can Golang reuse build artifacts? Kind regards Felix

Re: Updates for Go

2023-08-22 Thread Attila Lendvai
> each package for those two to work properly. Also, while having pinned > versions of dependencies upstream seems like the consensus, I'm not sure > we'd like doing that, be it for the exponential CI work that would be > required. not arguing either way, FWIW: - rumour has it that golang compil

Re: Updates for Go

2023-08-22 Thread Wilko Meyer
Hi Katherine, Katherine Cox-Buday writes: > Thank you for volunteering! > > I'm not aware of a TODO list anywhere other than the issue tracker > (https://issues.guix.gnu.org/search?query=golang+is%3Aopen). I've spend some time during the last days getting familiar with the go-build-system in

Re: Updates for Go

2023-08-22 Thread Josselin Poiret
Hi Felix, Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." writes: > From my experience of packaging Gocryptfs in Debian and here, perhaps > some reconsideration should be given to the widely unpopular idea of > using more package functions in Guix. Ending in asterisk