Hi Simon et al.,
Simon Tournier writes:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 at 12:05, Maxim Cournoyer
> wrote:
>
>> On a side note, it would also introduce some kind of hierarchy in the
>> group, which I dislike. One of the things that make Guix special is
>> that it's pretty flat -- everybod
Hi Attila,
Attila Lendvai writes:
> (set! config (apply-config-defaults config))
You can simply shadow the config variable rather than setting its value,
using (let ((config (...))) ...) or even define if you're in the right
form.
Best,
--
Josselin Poiret
signature.asc
Description: PGP sig
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, dem 09.03.2023 um 02:28 + schrieb Bruno Victal:
> After spending some time with old and new Guix services, I'd like to
> suggest some potential improvements to our define-configuration
> macro:
>
>
> User-specified sanitizer support
> ==
Hi guix,
As for today, the inheritance of emacs, master branch, variants is as
follows
(emacs-next-tree-sitter (emacs-next-gtk (emacs-next (emacs
Having tree-sitter is really useful, but optional, and doesn’t produce
any harm to users. They may opt to use it, or not.
This is
Hi Guix,
Just to let you all know that I recently added light and dark styles to the
package browser (https://codeberg.org/luis-felipe/guix-packages-website).
Screenshots:
Light:
https://luis-felipe.gitlab.io/media/2023/03/guix-packages-website-light-mode.png
Dark:
https://luis-felipe.gitlab.
Bruno Victal writes:
> Co-authored-by: Felix Lechner
>
>
> After spending some time with old and new Guix services, I'd like to
> suggest some potential improvements to our define-configuration macro:
>
>
> User-specified sanitizer support
> ===
Hello Lars,
Am Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 01:45:54PM +0100 schrieb Lars-Dominik Braun:
> I tried to compile GHC on core-updates recently, but didn’t even get
> to GHC 9.2.5, because python2 failed to build (test test_asyncore failed,
> without any further information). Do you have any extra patches appl
Hi Simon,
Simon Tournier writes:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> On Tue, 07 Mar 2023 at 11:54, Maxim Cournoyer
> wrote:
>
>>> For what it is worth, I do not see an high difference between the both
>>> indentations. So, my opinion would to keep the current practise.
>>
>> Please take a look at my original mes
Hello Andreas,
> the latest trial to compile ghc@9.2.5 resulted in many test errors,
> see below.
I tried to compile GHC on core-updates recently, but didn’t even get
to GHC 9.2.5, because python2 failed to build (test test_asyncore failed,
without any further information). Do you have any extra
Hi,
On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 at 13:58, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> number of their R package updates (thanks!)). It seems starting to use
> the 'Reviewed-by' git message tag would make this easy to account for.
Quoting from thread [1]:
I agree that Reviewed-by would be helpful.
Once
Hi Maxim,
On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 at 12:05, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> On a side note, it would also introduce some kind of hierarchy in the
> group, which I dislike. One of the things that make Guix special is
> that it's pretty flat -- everybody can participate at the same level, at
> least between
Hello,
the latest trial to compile ghc@9.2.5 resulted in many test errors,
see below.
Andreas
SUMMARY for test run started at Thu Mar 9 06:51:34 2023
2:19:05.987429 spent to go through
8323 total tests, which gave rise to
41557 test cases, of which
29559 were skipped
44 had mi
> Record Validator
> ===
>
> There is also a need to validate records. Matching fields alone do
> not actually ensure that the configuration is coherent and
> usable. For example, some fields may be mutually incompatible w
13 matches
Mail list logo
