On 2023-02-12 01:14, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andrew Tropin skribis:
>
>> On 2023-02-11 16:35, Andrew Tropin wrote:
>
> [...]
>
The change to guix-emacs.el is pretty impactful here since that affects
all the emacs packages including emacs-minimal I think.
If I've under
Hi,
Andrew Tropin skribis:
> On 2023-02-11 16:35, Andrew Tropin wrote:
[...]
>>> The change to guix-emacs.el is pretty impactful here since that affects
>>> all the emacs packages including emacs-minimal I think.
>>>
>>> If I've understood your comment correctly, that does seem pretty
>>> wast
Hi Nicolas!
Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
distribution." skribis:
> I found an working solution to avoid waiting for the `Computing Guix
> derivation' part when pulling or else.
>
> Here's my snippet:
>
> ```
> (use-modules
> (git)
> (guix profiles)
> (srfi sr
Hi Gábor!
Gábor Boskovits skribis:
> I will contact Jose, pass a link to the ideas side and check how to proceed
> and if we can help somehow.
Awesome, thank you. (And thanks everyone for working on the wiki page!)
Ludo’.
Hi Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> half a year ago I submitted this bug report:
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/57501
>
> “call-with-file-lock” and “call-with-file-lock/no-wait” create a lock
> file but don’t remove the lock file when they exit. The lock on
> the file is lifted, but the lock f
For these interested, this issue/patch adds emacs using motif to Guix
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/61421
Please review... etc.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 7:01 PM Eric Brown wrote:
> My interest in this package is because
> openmotif is the best of the X window managers that do not suffer from
> a ra
These were found with:
make GUILE_WARNINGS='-W1 -Wunused-module'
* module/ice-9/copy-tree.scm:
* module/ice-9/eval-string.scm:
* module/ice-9/getopt-long.scm:
* module/ice-9/poll.scm:
* module/ice-9/popen.scm:
* module/ice-9/sandbox.scm:
* module/ice-9/threads.scm:
* module/sxml/apply-templates
* module/language/tree-il/fix-letrec.scm (fix-letrec): Remove "Local
Variables" bit.
* .dir-locals.el (scheme-mode): Add 'record-case'.
---
.dir-locals.el | 1 +
module/language/tree-il/fix-letrec.scm | 4
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/.
* module/language/tree-il/analyze.scm (): New record type.
(unused-module-analysis): New variable.
(make-unused-module-analysis): New analysis.
(make-analyzer): Add it.
* module/system/base/message.scm (%warning-types): Add 'unused-module'.
* test-suite/tests/tree-il.test (%opts-w-unused-module): N
Hello Guilers!
Following a discussion started at the Guix Days and continued online¹,
it seems we could benefit from a compiler warning for unused modules,
and this is what this patch does.
The new ‘-Wunused-module’ warning is enabled at ‘-W2’ only. The main
reason for not enabling it at ‘-W1’ i
Hello Guix developers,
Does guix deploy support cross compilation targets (as opposed to qemu
emulation with binfmt_misc)?
If not, would you consider adding support for that? With some guidance on
where to find the appropriate locations to modify in the codebase, I could
try to help out.
Here is
Am Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 01:43:56PM +0200 schrieb Manolis Ragkousis:
> Yes, I agree for my
> contribution to the blog posts with the license under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
> GFDL version 1.3 or later
I also agree, in case I have not yet.
Andreas
On 2023-02-11 16:35, Andrew Tropin wrote:
> On 2023-02-11 11:29, Christopher Baines wrote:
>
>> guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
>>
>>> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
>>>
>>> abcdw pushed a commit to branch master
>>> in repository guix.
>>>
>>> The following commit
Dear lawyers of the world,
I agree for my contribution to the blog post
https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2022/10-years-of-stories-behind-guix/
to be published under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later (or
whatever other open license the maintainers of the blog might prefer in
the future)
Dear lawyers of the world,
I agree for my contribution to the blog post
https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2022/10-years-of-stories-behind-guix/
to be published under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later (or
whatever other open license the maintainers of the blog might prefer in
the future).
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:22:15 +0100
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> You might remember that I started long ago asking people who had
> contributed to the blog whether they would agree to licensing their
> work under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL version 1.3 or later, with no
> Invariant Sections
> Do you agree to licensing your contribution under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL
> version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and
> no Back-Cover Texts?
Yes, I agree.
publickey - luis.felipe.la@protonmail.com - 0x12DE1598.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.a
On 2023-02-11 11:29, Christopher Baines wrote:
> guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
>
>> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
>>
>> abcdw pushed a commit to branch master
>> in repository guix.
>>
>> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
>>
Hi,
> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush,
> though the sooner the more likely we are to get an answer.
I’m also fine with the terms proposed here.
Lars
I thought I agreed when I sent my part, but in case I haven't:
I agree to licensing your contribution under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL
version 1.3 or later, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts,
and no Back-Cover Texts.
Hello everyone,
Yes, I agree for my
contribution to the blog posts with the license under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and
GFDL version 1.3 or later
Thank you,
Manolis
guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
>
> abcdw pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
> new c77a3d4554 gnu: emacs: Add TREE_SITTER_GRAMMAR_PA
Hi,
On Fri, 02 Dec 2022 at 17:06, zimoun wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 18:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Simon, what do you think about emailing the authors of the “10 years of
>> stories” post asking if they agree with the licensing? :-) No rush,
>> though the sooner the more likely we are
Hi,
On Thu, 09 Feb 2023 at 18:07, "jgart" wrote:
> Just opening this thread for us to brainstorm how we can improve the
> symbiosis between guix build -S and --with-branch.
Well, indeed this bug could be fixed,
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix build eles
24 matches
Mail list logo
