WDYT:
guix deploy machine.scm --host-key="ssh-ed25519
C3NzaC1lZDI1NTE5IEEz3nkI1me0/CESu+XA8yyWF8OPkhVaRv+Xg+WZdjg+
jg...@dismail.de"
"jgart" writes:
> Hi Guixers,
>
> What do you think if we would be able to give past generations a name?
>
> I'm thinking of the way you can do the following with git:
>
> git stash -m "My description of this important stash."
>
> I think this would help differentiate slight differences that wo
Here is what I'm trying to do:
I have a package that inherits from the ocaml package. Because of
Various Reasons (tm) I am using substitute-keyword-arguments and
modify-phases and I need to duplicate the shebang patching phase after
multiple phases.
What I wanted to do was write a helper function
Hi Guixers,
What do you think if we would be able to give past generations a name?
I'm thinking of the way you can do the following with git:
git stash -m "My description of this important stash."
I think this would help differentiate slight differences that would be hard to
tell what the stat
zimoun writes:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 12:46, Maxim Cournoyer
> wrote:
>
>>> So far the we use (srfi srfi-35) exclusively to define condition types;
>>> I think we should do the same here, for consistency.
>>
>> Could we instead start migrating away from srfi-35 to (ice-9
>> exceptions), whi
Hi Simon,
zimoun writes:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 12:46, Maxim Cournoyer
> wrote:
>
>>> So far the we use (srfi srfi-35) exclusively to define condition types;
>>> I think we should do the same here, for consistency.
>>
>> Could we instead start migrating away from srfi-35 to (ic
Christopher Baines writes:
> A few weeks back, I sent a patch with some changes to the commit policy [1]:
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/59513
>
> There's already been some feedback and revisions which is great. The
> policy also suggests guix-devel as a place for discussions regarding the
>
Hi Maxim,
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 12:46, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> So far the we use (srfi srfi-35) exclusively to define condition types;
>> I think we should do the same here, for consistency.
>
> Could we instead start migrating away from srfi-35 to (ice-9
> exceptions), which is the new nativ
Hi,
I do not know if the issue is on Guix side or Org-mode side; or maybe on
my side, hence this email. :-)
Here a reproducer:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ cat config.el
(setq
org-directory "/tmp/"
org-agenda-files '("example.org")
org-element-cache-per
Hi Simon,
Thanks for the input - comments at the bottom:
On 11/01/2023 22:51, Simon Tournier wrote:
It is often discussed. :-) Well, ‘guix package’ uses SRFI-37 [2] and it
is possible to combine some action; as --switch-generation and
--delete-generations for instance. Aside note that one tr
Hi Liliana,
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> Am Sonntag, dem 15.01.2023 um 21:09 -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > > We should do better. I mean, it’s just a text editor, isn’t it?
>> > Well, gedit is also "just an editor" which wei
Hi Maxim,
On ven., 13 janv. 2023 at 22:23, Maxim Cournoyer
wrote:
> There is currently a proposed change [0] to modify the behavior of the
> LOOKUP-PLATFORM-BY-SYSTEM, LOOKUP-PLATFORM-BY-TARGET and
> LOOKUP-PLATFORM-BY-TARGET-OR-SYSTEM public procedures from (guix
> platforms) that would have t
12 matches
Mail list logo
