On Tue Aug 2, 2022 at 11:09 AM +0200, Maxime Devos wrote:
> On 02-08-2022 07:21, mcsi...@disroot.org wrote:
> > On Mon Aug 1, 2022 at 10:43 PM +0200, Mája Tomášek wrote:
> > > More realistic (imo) is that zig should be encouraged
> > > to build dynamically linked packages, not static ones,
> > > an
On 02-08-2022 07:21, mcsi...@disroot.org wrote:
Zig source files could be handled in the same manner as C headers
however, and be used as native inputs, so downstream can still
update a library for all dependees at once.
Going for native-inputs and not non-native sounds incorrect when
cross-c
On 02-08-2022 07:21, mcsi...@disroot.org wrote:
On Mon Aug 1, 2022 at 10:43 PM +0200, Mája Tomášek wrote:
More realistic (imo) is that zig should be encouraged to build
dynamically linked packages, not static ones, and allow the ability
(with their future package manager) for the distribution t
On 01-08-2022 22:43, Mája Tomášek wrote:
But I understand it wouldn't be popular, locking an independent language
into the guix ecosystem.
They could consider multiple package managers and distros (e.g.: Guix
support, Debian support, vcpkg support, ...) according to what users of
Zig are usi
Hello,
This change broke greetd on my side as I am using it with
gtkgreet.
While greetd is running as root, specific greeter started by it is
not.
This many groups was required to:
- make it able starting graphical greeters with user greeter
- access to seatd's socket file
I admit that, i
