Thanks everyone for the useful comments and suggestions! I took most of them
into account in polishing the patch for submission and more formal review (with
the exception of keeping in glibc-for-fhs and the ld cache; to be discussed). I
feel the patch looks much better now thanks to you all.
Pl
Hi,
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, July 20th, 2022 at 8:20 PM, Csepp wrote:
>
> I was looking for this patch on issues.guix.gnu.org and could not figure
> out why it's not there and I'd just like to point out that having like 6
> mailing lists with at least two separate indexes i
Hi Maxime,
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, July 20th, 2022 at 7:49 PM, Maxime Devos wrote:
>
> On 20-07-2022 23:22, John Kehayias wrote:
>
> > I was thinking mostly of binaries, though I've also encountered code that
> > wanted to read the ldcache (e.g. parsing ldconfig -p directl
I was looking for this patch on issues.guix.gnu.org and could not figure
out why it's not there and I'd just like to point out that having like 6
mailing lists with at least two separate indexes is... not great :) I
appreciate everyone's work on Mumi and Debbugs but... maybe this is an
avoidable
On 20-07-2022 23:22, John Kehayias wrote:
I was thinking mostly of binaries, though I've also encountered code that
wanted to read the ldcache (e.g. parsing ldconfig -p directly), for some reason.
Do you have an example in the wild?
Greetings,
Maxime.
OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc
Descri
Hi Ludo’,
--- Original Message ---
On Monday, July 18th, 2022 at 7:40 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello!
>
> John Kehayias skribis:
>
> > 2. Typically binaries will expect the ld loader to use
> > /etc/ld.so.cache for finding libraries.
>
> Not necessarily. /etc/ld.so.cache is an optimiz
Hi Csepp!
Csepp anaandika:
> jgart writes:
>
>> Hi Guixers,
>>
>> I just wanted to share this presentation that Singpolyma gave titled "Guix
>> Without Scheme":
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/singpolyma-guix-without-scheme
>>
>> Through the course of the presentation, singpolyma demos how t
On 20-07-2022 18:03, Raghav Gururajan wrote:
[2] IIUC, HyperbolaBSD (OS) consist of a custom-made kernel and a
custom-made userspace, both of which the components are either derived
from OpenBSD System or written from scratch. So two things can be
explored, *separately*.
(A) Guix System with
Hello Guix!
I'd like to add following points to this discourse:
[1] The idea isn't off-topic, because, Guix is meant to be kernel
agnostic. So exploring HyperbolaBSD as a kernel option for Guix is with
in the prospect.
[2] IIUC, HyperbolaBSD (OS) consist of a custom-made kernel and a
custom
jgart writes:
> Hi Guixers,
>
> I just wanted to share this presentation that Singpolyma gave titled "Guix
> Without Scheme":
>
> https://archive.org/details/singpolyma-guix-without-scheme
>
> Through the course of the presentation, singpolyma demos how to build
> a Guix package with javascrip
On 20-07-2022 10:33, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
Hi,
shall native-inputs be as complete as possible or as minimal as possible?
Background: I just stepped over a couple of packages where upstream
requires a lot of code-quality checkers which are not actually run
when running the tests. (More specif
Hi,
shall native-inputs be as complete as possible or as minimal as possible?
Background: I just stepped over a couple of packages where upstream
requires a lot of code-quality checkers which are not actually run when
running the tests. (More specific: These are Python packages demanding
tool
12 matches
Mail list logo
