Hello,
Sanity check, please.
When `strip-binaries?` is `#f` and a "debug" output is defined, said output
remains empty. Instead, I expect "debug" to get populated with separated debug
files.
The logic for creating debug files exists in (guix build gnu-build-system)
under the definition of `strip
On 2022-06-23, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>>> Perhaps to show our stand here we could patch our copy of pdftex with
>>> 's/FORCE_SOURCE_DATE/SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH/', lest we end up with a grocery
>>> list of *SOURCE_DATE* variable variants.
>>
>> Sure, with some technical details fixed up, as I think they
Hi,
Just a pre-emptive note that, yes, I'm aware.
Kind regards,
T G-R
Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
Hi,
Mark's reply addresses everything that would worry me from an FSDG
perspective and more -- thanks Mark!
On 2022-07-01 15:12, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
It may also be that this qualifies as fair use (AIUI, we’re talking
about pages extracted from larger PDF files, right?).
...but from a cop
Am Dienstag, dem 28.06.2022 um 23:19 +0200 schrieb Marius Bakke:
> Hello Guix,
>
> I discovered a potential freedom issue with the Poppler test suite.
> [...]
> So the million dollar question ... are these files okay to use for
> Guix?
>
> In my (non-lawyer) opinion, I have faith that Poppler dev
