> On 15 Jun 2022, at 09:15, Arun Isaac wrote:
>
> I would also like to raise a couple of more controversial suggestions:
>
> Should we restrict the set of packages that will be accepted into Guix?
> Currently, we accept practically any free software package into
> Guix. Should we limit the nu
Hi brian, et al,
On +2022-06-17 11:37:18 -0400, Brian Cully via Development of GNU Guix and the
GNU System distribution. wrote:
>
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> > So plain ‘emacs’ package doesn’t work on Wayland? That sounds like a
> > recipe for a poor user experience, no?
>
> The mainline E
Hi Maxime,
On 18-06-2022 14:23, Maxime Devos wrote:
indieterminacy schreef op za 18-06-2022 om 13:53 [+0200]:
Additionally, based upon a decent demonstration on LMDB, I realised
that
my annotation system makes it more feasible to adapt documents into
LDIF
database-like-files (is that the corr
indieterminacy schreef op za 18-06-2022 om 13:53 [+0200]:
> Additionally, based upon a decent demonstration on LMDB, I realised that
> my annotation system makes it more feasible to adapt documents into LDIF
> database-like-files (is that the correct terminology Maxime?) -
> potentially turning
Hello Brian,
On 16-06-2022 15:09, Brian Cully via "Development of GNU Guix and the
GNU System distribution." wrote:
caton...@gmail.com writes:
I asked for indications about the process (what magic to use in the
REPL)
My experience with Guix, in general, is that the REPL isn't
particularly u
