Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0

2022-06-16 Thread Philip McGrath
Hi, On Thursday, June 16, 2022 3:43:39 AM EDT Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Hi Philip, > > Am Donnerstag, dem 16.06.2022 um 02:21 -0400 schrieb Philip McGrath: > > Hi Guix, > > > > Is the Apple Public Source License 2.0 (APSL-2.0 [1]) a free license > > according to Guix's standards? > > While

Re: RISCV porting effort

2022-06-16 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hello Pjotr, Pjotr Prins writes: > Most of you are probably aware that a RISC-V effort is going on in GNU > Guix. > > Ekaitz is working on the GNU Mes bootstrap and Efraim is porting > packages (gcc and clang are ported), both NLNet projects. Also with > our NSF project we are using GNU Guix for

Re: how to write services (was: Re: Teams)

2022-06-16 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
caton...@gmail.com writes: I asked for indications about the process (what magic to use in the REPL) My experience with Guix, in general, is that the REPL isn't particularly useful for any task beyond very simple testing (eg, what are the contents of ‘%base-services’). It's a shame, but I

Re: Release v1.4?

2022-06-16 Thread Josselin Poiret
Hello, Ludovic Courtès writes: >> * switching gdm-configuration-wayland? to #t, so that the OOB experience >> with Wayland sessions is better. > > Perhaps I’m biased because I use Xorg, but I wonder how good a default > that is? To put it differently, what fraction of the user base uses > Waylan

Re: how to write services (was: Re: Teams)

2022-06-16 Thread Maxime Devos
Blake Shaw schreef op do 16-06-2022 om 06:20 [+0700]: > But, perhaps it's just getting late and the matters are now & the > details are slipping my mind, but im starting to realize im unsure of > many examples of file-like objects that aren't a file? The email > where you responded re: packages was

Re: FSDG-compatibility of APSL-2.0

2022-06-16 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Hi Philip, Am Donnerstag, dem 16.06.2022 um 02:21 -0400 schrieb Philip McGrath: > Hi Guix, > > Is the Apple Public Source License 2.0 (APSL-2.0 [1]) a free license > according to Guix's standards? While it isn't included in the free licenses list the FSF publishes, from your note [6] I would gue