I've been working on Reproducible Builds in guix a fair amount this
month.
data.guix.gnu.org has proven invaluable for this work, big thanks for
that!
https://data.guix.gnu.org/repository/1/branch/master/latest-processed-revision/package-reproducibility
I have cataloged many of the packages
Hi,
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> Let's do it
S… turns out commit e31ab8c24848a7691a838af8df61d3e7097cddbc on
‘master’ unwillingly triggered a rebuild of 2K packages.
It’s too late to revert (they’ve been built anyway), but I’ve merged
‘master’ in ‘staging’ so they can be built there.
Which
Hi,
Thiago Jung Bauermann skribis:
> Sorry for the delay. I've built some packages from the staging branch on
> powerpc64le-linux (including Emacs, which brings in a lot of stuff) and
> it seems good.
That’s good news, thanks for testing!
Ludo’.
Hello,
Am Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 12:35:13AM +0200 schrieb Tobias Geerinckx-Rice:
this ended up in the Guix folder at a time I was not reading it, so I am
discovering it only now...
> Your GPG key used to sign Guix commits is missing from your Savannah
> profile[0] and hence its Guix keyring[1].
A
Giovanni Biscuolo schreef op zo 12-06-2022 om 11:42 [+0200]:
> > or have packages with bundled dependencies (e.g. vendored jars).
>
> bundling binaries it's (is it?) for sure against the definition of a
> reproducible build, but what about bundling (source) dependencies?
>
> AFAIU not to bundle (
Christopher Baines writes:
> So, one thing that I'd be interested in, is hearing from anyone who
> thinks they get worse download performance from bordeaux.guix.gnu.org or
> ci.guix.gnu.org than they get when downloading other
> things. Importantly, it would be good to know roughly where
> (geog
Hi Ricardo and all,
following this discussion, it came to my mind a great presentation made
by Prot:
https://protesilaos.com/codelog/2021-12-21-emacsconf2021-freedom/
«How Emacs made me appreciate software freedom»
especially the "You can't be an Emacs tourist" part; I think that
similar argumen
>> - We have strict conventions for commit messages. Our commit message
>> Changelog is a strange dated practice from the time before good
>> version control systems. I can live with it, but not everyone likes
>> it. Let's just say I've heard complaints about it offlist.
>
> AFAIU this is a
> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 14:27:44 +0200
> From: Giovanni Biscuolo
> To: Arun Isaac , Guix Devel
>
> Cc: GNU Guix maintainers
> Subject: Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy
> Message-ID: <87o7z0itz3@xelera.eu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>> - We
