Thanks for reply Ricardo.
The source in each one will be slightly different and although I only specify
commit id in the package, each package commit id will reference a different
branch.
To give some context, each commit id relates to a different Pull Request
branch. After my integration sour
Matt writes:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 10:21:51 -0500 zimoun
> wrote
>
> > (On a side note between parenthesis, we should avoid to fall into the
> > "Package Definition" tutorial fallacy; as explained here for monads
> >
> https://byorgey.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/abstraction-intuitio
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:30:22 -0500 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
wrote
> Hullo Matt,
>
> Matt 写道：
> > I feel like it also says that community isn't important to us.
>
> I understand how you could reach a flawed conclusion from a flawed
> assumption:
>
> > Wikis are synonymous with
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 18:18:25 -0500 Ricardo Wurmus
wrote
> This is where we disagree. I’ve wasted so much time in my life
> following outdated or wrong instructions on forums or wikis. I really
> don’t want to see anything half-baked anywhere near this project. There
> are few
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 21:57:03 -0500 Matt wrote
>
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 20:20:30 -0500 jgart wrote
>
> > Have you read ambrevar's post called 'Guix Profiles in Practice'?
> >
> > Unfortunately ambrevar's blog seems to be down at the moment:
> >
> > https://am
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 20:20:30 -0500 jgart wrote
> Have you read ambrevar's post called 'Guix Profiles in Practice'?
>
> Unfortunately ambrevar's blog seems to be down at the moment:
>
> https://ambrevar.xyz/guix-profiles/index.html
>
No, I haven't. Thanks!
It's archived:
ht
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:17:43 -0500 Ricardo Wurmus
wrote
>
> Matt writes:
>
> > To me, it says something like, we don't actually care about your
> > contribution: you have to literally buy in first.
>
> No, you do not.
I stand corrected. Luis Felipe kindly pointed out what
Hi Zimoun,
I'm disappointed by the ‘bikeshedding’ insult. I really don't
care what you call it.
- cathedral, as it is today
I object to redefining loaded terms to promote it.
Kind regards,
T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 03:29:35 -0500 Josua Stingelin
wrote
> I've been following the gnunet for a while so I felt qualified to comment.
>
> > Concern 1: guix will be soon be distributed over gnunet
> Guix could provide an endpoint in the gnunet network for users that prefer to
> u
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 10:21:51 -0500 zimoun
wrote
> (On a side note between parenthesis, we should avoid to fall into the
> "Package Definition" tutorial fallacy; as explained here for monads
> https://byorgey.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/abstraction-intuition-and-the-monad-tutorial-fall
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 19:59:37 -0500 Matt wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:24:20 -0500 jgart wrote
>
> > I'm looking forward to having you at the next docs meetup:
> >
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00189.html
> >
> > Are there any particular sections
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:24:20 -0500 jgart wrote
> I'm looking forward to having you at the next docs meetup:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-01/msg00189.html
>
> Are there any particular sections in the guix manual that you would like
> to work on in the m
Attila Lendvai writes:
> sending a patch to the manual is a way higher threshold than editing a
> wiki, especially when it's someone's first contribution. and some
> random, half-baked copy-paste doesn't belong in the manual, while it
> may be very useful when found in a wiki using the search e
Phil writes:
> I update the same single package on each channel locally with a
> different git commit id and package version. So 12 variations of the
> same package, accessing different commit ids, in the same package's
> source repo, and having different package versions in Guix.
Do they hav
Hi all,
I'm seeing strange issues when running many "guix build" commands of the
same package simultaneously on the same linux account/server at the same
time.
Tracing this requires a lot of detective work, so for now I've omitted
the logs - my initial question is - am I doing something which is
> > There is something here:
> > https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Guix
[...]
> I was thrilled to see a wiki link on the homepage and disgusted to
> see that it didn't actually foster community. In fact, there's
> strife immediately within the "community" wiki, the simple fact it
> exists, let a
Ryan Prior writes:
> Hey André, glad you're working on this!
>
> I have an Emacs package with native-compilation, pgtk, sqlite3, xinput2, and
> xwidgets that I call "emacs-edge" and have been using daily with Spacemacs.
> [1]
>
> Hope you're able to get yours working, I'd love to move back to a
Maxime Devos writes:
> André A. Gomes schreef op di 11-01-2022 om 22:13 [+0300]:
>> Maxime Devos writes:
>>
>> > > A log below.
>> > >
>> > > --8<---cut here---start->8---
>> > > configure: error: The installed libgccjit failed to compile and run a
>> > > tes
Malte Gerdes writes:
> Hi,
>
> https://github.com/flatwhatson/guix-channel
>
> Contains a working Emacs 28.0.90.
Thank you!
--
André A. Gomes
"Free Thought, Free World"
Hey André, glad you're working on this!
I have an Emacs package with native-compilation, pgtk, sqlite3, xinput2, and
xwidgets that I call "emacs-edge" and have been using daily with Spacemacs. [1]
Hope you're able to get yours working, I'd love to move back to an upstream
Guix package instead o
Hi,
https://github.com/flatwhatson/guix-channel
Contains a working Emacs 28.0.90.
Hope this helps,
Malte
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022, 20:42 Maxime Devos, wrote:
> André A. Gomes schreef op di 11-01-2022 om 22:13 [+0300]:
> > Maxime Devos writes:
> >
> > > > A log below.
> > > >
> > > > --8<-
André A. Gomes schreef op di 11-01-2022 om 22:13 [+0300]:
> Maxime Devos writes:
>
> > > A log below.
> > >
> > > --8<---cut here---start->8---
> > > configure: error: The installed libgccjit failed to compile and run a
> > > test program using
> > > the libg
Howdy!
Julien Lepiller skribis:
>>From b1ed3af5838b65293441f62e5d6447357be849b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Julien Lepiller
> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:05:05 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] website: Add conference announcement.
>
> * website/posts/online-guix-days-2022-announce-1.md: New file.
>
On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 11:54:25AM +0100, Maxime Devos wrote:
> Hi guix reviewers and committers,
>
> WDYT of tagging reviewed patches that look good with a usertag,
> e.g. 'reviewed-looks-good':
>
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?tag=reviewed-looks-good&users=guix
>
> then if a commi
> I don't know how many people in the community have
> non-CS/Unix/programming backgrounds so I share some personal thoughts
> below. It's not that I want to share my life, but it might resonate
> with the experiences of others.
Thank you for sharing your story. It resonates with me as mine i
Hi Tobias,
I agree with your words. And probably my wrong choice of words to
convey my points.
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 18:55, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> > - cathedral, as it is today
>
> This is revisionist. The Bazaar model perfectly describes Guix,
Well, I do not think the Cookbook is
Maxime Devos writes:
>> A log below.
>>
>> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>> configure: error: The installed libgccjit failed to compile and run a test
>> program using
>> the libgccjit library; see config.log for the details of the failure.
>> [...]
>
> confi
Hi,
André A. Gomes schreef op di 11-01-2022 om 21:32 [+0300]:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I tried to package Emacs as mentioned in the subject without success.
> I'm wondering if someone else has done it already. Note that I have few
> experience.
>
> Please find my attempt below.
>
> https://git.sr.ht/~aa
Hi Guix,
I tried to package Emacs as mentioned in the subject without success.
I'm wondering if someone else has done it already. Note that I have few
experience.
Please find my attempt below.
https://git.sr.ht/~aadcg/aadcg-guix-channel/tree/master/item/packages/aadcg-emacs.scm
A log below.
-
Hi Matt,
Thanks for an interesting and thoughtful thread.
FYI, I am developing an interpreting application that will be mixing
Emacs-Hyperboles tree orientated format with Gemini protocol's GemText format
(as well as some classification approaches). Potentially it can (eventually)
make a good
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
> Hi Simon, all,
>
> I'll give your long and thoughtful reply the attention it deserves
> when I have time, but there's another misleading tangent that has
> bothered me (elsewhere) in this discussion:
>
>> - cathedral, as it is today
>
> This is revisionist. The
Hi Simon, all,
I'll give your long and thoughtful reply the attention it deserves
when I have time, but there's another misleading tangent that has
bothered me (elsewhere) in this discussion:
- cathedral, as it is today
This is revisionist. The Bazaar model perfectly describes Guix,
whe
Hi Tobias, all,
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 16:30, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Guix cares about community very much. Many of us care very little
> for wikis, having seen how they attract much outdated and
> incorrect information and spam. Wikis are high-maintenance.
I agree with these words…
>
Hi Ludo'!
Sigh. Sorry. I know what this will sound like. :-)
guix-comm...@gnu.org 写道：
+ ('base32 '(sha256 origin))
I know this is your style, but I would *really* prefer this to be:
+ ('source '(package))
instead.
I know! But wait! I think that's defensible: for the same reason
Hi, Matt.
On Tuesday, January 11th, 2022 at 1:31 PM, Matt wrote:
> There is something here:
> https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Guix
> Good point and it's already linked from the Guix homepage. Trouble is, it
> only seems editable by FSF associate members (which costs $120 or $60 for
> stude
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 17:23:38 +0100 Oliver Propst
wrote:
> On 2022-01-11 17:01, jgart wrote:
> > Hi Guixers,
>
> Hi Jgart thanks for the *note.
>
> *will try to attend the meeting.
Hi Oliver,
Cool, hope to see you there!
all best,
jgart
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 08:15:34 -0500 Matt wrote:
> > Also if I understand things correctly there are
> > actually plans to host a documentation meetup this Saturday (maybe at
> > around 10:30 AM ET as the last ones).
>
> Thank you! I should be able to attend.
>
> Is that January 15, at 10:30
On 2022-01-11 17:01, jgart wrote:
Hi Guixers,
Hi Jgart thanks for the *note.
*will try to attend the meeting.
--
Kinds regards Oliver Propst
https://twitter.com/Opropst
Hullo Matt,
Matt 写道：
I feel like it also says that community isn't important to us.
I understand how you could reach a flawed conclusion from a flawed
assumption:
Wikis are synonymous with community.
But it's still circular, wrong, and frankly quite offensive.
Guix cares about community
Hi Guixers,
I want to invite you to the second Guix Documentation Meetup this Saturday,
Jan. 15, 2022.
The meetup will take place on Big Blue Button at the following room:
https://meet.nixnet.services/b/jga-rtw-ahw-yky
I want to thank nixnet for hosting the BBB!
The meeting will start at 10:30
Matt writes:
> To me, it says something like, we don't actually care about your
> contribution: you have to literally buy in first.
No, you do not.
I see a lot of emotional language here, but the fact is: you can
contribute to our documentation by sending your text. It’s that
simple. You do
> Hi,
>
> My two points are:
>
> 1. we could have a Guix planet -- we should avoid the cathedral for
> quick recipes
> 2. too many different goals are directed to the Cookbook
>
>
> Well, my point is: instead of cathedral with an authority accepting
> patches after review, why not
> There are definitely wikis which use fairly simple markup
> (e.g. markdown) and can usefully be read and updated online via a web
> interface and git offline or online. The one I'm most familiar with is
> ikiwiki (available in guix), though don't have a lot of experience
> updating it via th
> There is something here:
> https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Guix
Good point and it's already linked from the Guix homepage. Trouble is, it only
seems editable by FSF associate members (which costs $120 or $60 for students).
Am I missing something?
While that meets the technical requiremen
On Tuesday, January 11th, 2022 at 9:41 AM, Julien Lepiller
wrote:
> Thanks, I like this better. Can you send a patch for it?
You're welcome. Here's the updated patch.From 3e4e5b28ff791a6484bc82bfb5813d140cac3573 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luis Felipe
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:24:41 -0500
S
Hi,
Really cool! Thanks for the nice artwork.
I am a bit late to the party but the post LGTM. :-)
Cheers,
simon
Efraim Flashner schreef op di 11-01-2022 om 12:39 [+0200]:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:57:09PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> > If nobody has another world rebuilding change deemed necessary in time
> > for the release, I suggest we enable substitutes on the branch soon, and
> > then get busy try
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:57:09PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> If nobody has another world rebuilding change deemed necessary in time
> for the release, I suggest we enable substitutes on the branch soon, and
> then get busy trying to get 'make dist' to succeed so that we can issue
> a first RC
There shouldn't be a need for the language tag at all, because the server uses
the user's language in that case. I'll fix the url and irc link. I'd love to
get the correct png, thanks!
Le 10 janvier 2022 20:52:10 GMT+01:00, Luis Felipe
a écrit :
>Hi, Julien.
>
>On Monday, January 10th, 2022 at
The variant is wonderful! I'll use that in the announcement. Thanks!
Le 10 janvier 2022 23:44:26 GMT+01:00, Luis Felipe
a écrit :
>I'm attaching a patch that fixes the jagged text in the source SVG and adds a
>variant of the poster. And here are PNGs from each of them:
>
>Original (fixed text):
Thanks, I like this better. Can you send a patch for it?
Le 11 janvier 2022 01:47:02 GMT+01:00, Luis Felipe
a écrit :
>On Monday, January 10th, 2022 at 10:44 PM, Luis Felipe
> wrote:
>
>> I'm attaching a patch that fixes the jagged text in the source SVG and adds
>> a variant of the poster. An
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 07:31:45PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> The CI hasn't yet been switched on to build the branch yet; let's give a
>> bit more time for other changes like this to have a chance to be
>> considered/merged and then switch it on! Perhaps Wednesday.
52 matches
Mail list logo
