I see. Thank you very much for this piece of information ! And I'm
relieved to know everything is fine with the UMC Utrecht instance.
Le Fri, 7 Jan 2022 00:13:40 +0530,
Sai Karthik a écrit :
> You could also obtain the json file from
> https://guix.gnu.org/packages.json
>
> On 05/01/22 13:08, T
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
> I've asked the debbugs crew over e-mail how to deal with [0], assuming
> there's a way to close bugs without pinging a malicious sender.
FYI: I adjusted the way we sync debbugs data (added a “--delete”) so now
that spam bug is also gone from issues.guix.gnu.org.
Welcome Efraim ! Best wishes for the duty.
Thank you Ludo' and Marius ! Enjoy the free time
Really hope I will still be able to trade a 'hi' in the IRC on my rare
connections. haha
Jérémy
OpenPGP_0x700F5E0CCBB2E2D1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPG
Hello Guix!
I'd like to bring your attention to a change to the current Guix
maintainers collective; in a nutshell, Ludovic and Marius are stepping
down from maintainer-ship while Efraim is joining.
I won't write more as you can find all the details in this blog post:
https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog
Hi Julien,
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 at 02:37, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> I suggest that we have these days right after Fosdem, Monday and
> Tuesday. This should give us just a few more days to prepare, as I think
> we're starting pretty late already. If you prefer to have them before
> fosdem, I can ch
All,
I've asked the debbugs crew over e-mail how to deal with [0],
assuming there's a way to close bugs without pinging a malicious
sender.
Please, nobody respond to or modify it in the mean time.
I'll follow up with a question on how we're supposed to moderate
bugs if the tracker & archive
You could also obtain the json file from https://guix.gnu.org/packages.json
On 05/01/22 13:08, Tissevert wrote:
Hi,
This JSON file sounds nice and useful. By the way, it may only be a
transient error but the instance of hpcguix-web running at UMC Utrecht
mentioned in the github repos seems to b
On Thu, 06 Jan 2022 09:44:27 -0600 Katherine Cox-Buday
wrote:
Hi Katherine,
> I hope we can take the reasons people make these channels and bring
> them back to Guix proper to make contributing here just as easy.
Contributing to Guix upstream is definitely high priority for the guixrus
channel
adriano writes:
> Il giorno dom, 12/12/2021 alle 21.50 -0600, Katherine Cox-Buday ha scritto:
>> - In geiser, run =,a thing-i-want-to-look-for= (this is supposedly an
>> apropos command that is supposed to search symbols for you). The command
>> returns nothing.
> about this, I want to report a
jgart writes:
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:27:04 +0100 raingloom wrote:
>> TLDR how much of the effort spent on this channel is really justified
>> compared to making the underserved use-cases easier in upstream Guix?
I also have my own personal "upstream staging" channel so that I can continue
co
Hello Chris,
Chris Marusich writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer writes:
>
>> About the current status, I'm nearing on pushing a version-1.4.0 branch
>> which is based on master with a few more (core-ish) updates. There's
>> still a few days ahead of that, so if you manage to get many of this
>> kind of
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> However, due to the time spent not building things, the backlog is
>> longer than usual, and the substitute availability (especially for
>> x86_64-linux and i686-linux) is lower than usual.
>
> Yeah, ‘guix weather coreutils’ finds nothing on bordeaux.guix right now.
I
On Wednesday, January 5th, 2022 at 11:52 PM, kiasoc5--- via "Development of GNU
Guix and the GNU System distribution." wrote:
> Dear Guixers,
>
> The hpcguix-web package interface (https://hpc.guix.info/browse) supports
> package search, unlike the current one at https://guix.gnu.org/en/packa
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, dem 06.01.2022 um 05:38 -0500 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
> > From here on, I will assume that each individual push action is
> > finite as you did, but I don't think that using communications of
> > finite length are a helpful building block here.
>
> Really? You don't think commu
Hi Liliana,
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> it ought to have been comparatively easy to infer that I was talking
> about push actions (plural) as sequences, not as individual push
> actions like you've used for your proof.
It makes no difference, because the set of push actions is closed under
s
Hi Ricardo,
Am Donnerstag, dem 06.01.2022 um 08:12 +0100 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
> So lets take a step back and look at the location and shape of the
> bikeshed rather than its color. Do we agree that it would be lovely
> to have a less flexible but declarative pattern to describe changes
> to fi
16 matches
Mail list logo
