p2p distributed substitutes; Swarm

I'm not involved, but this guy submitted a patch series you might find interesting: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2021-12/msg00770.html

Re: SSH service for Guix Home

Hi, Am Montag, der 20. Dezember 2021, um 23:31 +012, schrieb Ludovic Courtès : > I think we need to come to a shared understanding of what the next steps > are. Once we have that, we can clarify the current status in the manual > and release announcement, and open issues so that anyone who’d li

Re: SSH service for Guix Home

Hi, Am Montag, der 20. Dezember 2021, um 13:40 +03, schrieb Andrew Tropin : >>> Also, could you (or Xinglu, or Oleg) write a blog post for >>> guix.gnu.org, targeting an audience who’s not familiar with this kind >>> of tool, making it clear what the rationale is and what it can bring >>> to “no

Re: core-updates-frozen branch merged

Hello, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > >> In case you hadn't taken notice, the core-update-frozen branch was >> finally merged into master. So please reconfigure your remotes to avoid >> uploading any further work there :-). > > I’m late to the party, but that’s be

Re: Solstice infrastructure hackathon

Hello Guix! Ludovic Courtès skribis: > Here are tasks that were brought up: > > • Set up a backup server for berlin.guix.gnu.org, the head node of the > ci.guix.gnu.org, possibly moving some services such as the web site > there. > > • Add DNS redundancy for guix.gnu.org so it can po

Re: Release v1.4 (or 2.0): process and schedule ?

On 2021-12-21, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2021-12-19, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> zimoun writes: >>> In both case, what is the target for a release date? I propose January >>> 31rst. WDYT? >> >> I'd like to fix #52051 before issuing the first release candidate (RC). >> Assuming this can be made

Re: Release v1.4 (or 2.0): process and schedule ?

On 2021-12-19, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > zimoun writes: >> Now core-updates-frozen is merged. Now The Big Change [1 ]is done. Do >> we go for v1.4 or v2.0? > > As I've mentioned previously, I'd go for a 1.4.0 release, since overall > we've refined and improved (greatly!) what we already had rathe

Re: Guile documentation

Hi Ludo, (replying to this email from my other email address because I can't seem to find it in gnus, which I only recently switched to) For sure. I'm preparing a little document that provides an analysis of pain points in the docs, which I'll hopefully have done by the end of this week and can s

Re: extend ’guix archive’?

Hi, On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 00:50, Jack Hill wrote: > I think it would be great if one of the pastures to which we herd the nars > would be a free and open source software mirror site. In my experience, > these are usually some static web hosting in front of a large disk with a > place to run

Re: extend ’guix archive’?

Hi, On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 10:39, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > zimoun skribis: >> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 23:07, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> >>> Regarding nar-herder, I think it’d be nice to have a solution to >>> mirroring in Guix proper, developed similarly to other components, >>> because it could

[RFC PATCH] doc: Add Writing Service Configuration section.

* guix.texi (Writing Service Configuration): New section. --- After reading the source code of different system services and implementing a few of home services I decided to write down most important tips for implementing guix service configurations. I belive having such a guideline can simplify t

Redundancy for source code and Disarchive

Hello, Christopher Baines skribis: > zimoun writes: [...] >> Do you think that Bordeaux could run >> >> > > The Guix Build Coordinator just builds derivations. I haven't got it to > build a manifest before, but that'

Re: extend ’guix archive’?

Hi! zimoun skribis: > On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 23:07, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Regarding nar-herder, I think it’d be nice to have a solution to >> mirroring in Guix proper, developed similarly to other components, >> because it could be a fairly central tool. >> >> ‘guix publish’ is probably n