Am Donnerstag, den 25.11.2021, 04:03 + schrieb Jacob Hrbek:
> Make it clear it's an estimate, or maybe even abstract away the time
> units so that there is no expectation of any particular time. --
> Vagrant
>
> My theory is designed with tolerance of <5 min with max tolerance of
> =10 min wit
Make it clear it's an estimate, or maybe even abstract away the time units so
that there is no expectation of any particular time. -- Vagrant
My theory is designed with tolerance of <5 min with max tolerance of =10 min
with methods that I am confident will get us within <30 sec assuming sufficie
> The “pokémon-battle” model is a simple linear model
(cross-multiplication); using Jacob’s “notation” -- zimoun
It's not designed to be linear as the HP variable could be adjusted in real
time e.g. recalculating it every X amount of time as needed which can include
calculations for noise that i
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 08:55:31PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Computer A:
> --
> $ guix time-machine --commit=c70eadeaed9367e45be3797a17d3a34e5f8f67cd --
> build --no-grafts hello -d
> /gnu/store/260bk0ch4np4h2yz5yqhf8hjbsyhwpmr-hello-2.10.drv
> --
>
> Computer B:
> --
> $ guix time
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 15:13, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> zimoun writes:
>> Julia is annoying, Because the test suite sometimes passes, sometimes
>> not. Well, I am not even sure it is the same part that fails. I
>> notice that "guix build julia --without-tests=julia" then "guix build
>> ju
Hi Vagrant,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 12:23, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2021-11-24, zimoun wrote:
>> What if it takes 3h and the prediction says 2h?
>
> Those sound about "the same" for any kind of reasonable expectation...
Ah, we are not speaking about the same thing thus. :-)
> I would gues
On 2021-11-19, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2021-11-19, Philip McGrath wrote:
>> On 11/19/21 09:54, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
So, I guess I'm leaning towards making the guix lint check a little more
lenient.
Thoughts?
>>>
>>> That sounds even bette
Hi Florian,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 15:40, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)"
wrote:
>>> I don't know if that convinces maintainers to change decisions.
>>
>> This decision is consistent with the analysis [1] done by Software
>> Conservancy Freedom, at least.
>
> I did not speak about one decision.
A
On 2021-11-24, zimoun wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 18:50, Julien Lepiller wrote:
>> Do we even care that much about accuracy? I don't really care that the
>> build takes 30 or 31 seconds, or even 1 minute, but I certainly care
>> whether it takes 30s or 3h. I think this is also what SBUs give y
On 2021-11-24, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:03:18 +0100
> "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 01:45:19AM +0100, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
>> wrote:
https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2016/feb/25/zfs-and-linux/
> That article states that:
>> Pure di
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 07:10:48PM +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> Maybe there is consensus that adding ZFS is a legal risk.
I assume we are talking about the risk of litigation from Oracle (ZFS
owner), right?
Canonical decided in 2016 that the risk was low enough to take a chance
and
Hi Josselin,
Josselin Poiret writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer writes:
>
> at it throws, after adding the missing polkit export:
>>
>> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>> $ ./pre-inst-env guix build -s aarch64-linux gnome-control-center -n
>> guix build: error: gnu/pac
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 01:32:56PM +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> Sorry I misunderstood. I think your claim is that the ZFS decisions
> listed by Ludo i.e. to disallow binary substitutes but to allow
> patches for a ZFS file-system object (once reviewed) are inconsistent.
> Right?
>
>
Set up monero wallet to enable donations from privacy concious supporters
-- Jacob "Kreyren" Hrbek
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
publickey - kreyren@rixotstudio.cz - 0x1677DB82.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:03:18 +0100
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 01:45:19AM +0100, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
> wrote:
> > If that's the case then it would also be legal to redistribute
> > binaries too as long as they are dynamically linked as the linking
> > happens
Hi Florian,
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 13:32, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)"
wrote:
> I don't know if that convinces maintainers to change decisions.
This decision is consistent with the analysis [1] done by Software
Conservancy Freedom, at least.
I have not read a clear position by the FSF. They
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 01:03:29PM +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 01:45:19AM +0100, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote:
> > If that's the case then it would also be legal to redistribute binaries
> > too as long as they are dynamically linked as the linking happens at
Hi Guix,
currently we patch source code and build systems to ensure that no
special instructions are used that would not be portable,
e.g. AVX2, SSE4.1 etc. What do you think of adding a build system
option that would allow users to restore these optimizations?
The build phases that patch o
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 01:45:19AM +0100, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote:
> If that's the case then it would also be legal to redistribute binaries
> too as long as they are dynamically linked as the linking happens at
> runtime.
The FSF is unable to have such a position.
It seems unrelated to the
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 14:39, Jacob Hrbek wrote:
>> This approximation would not even be accurate enough for the same
>> machine. For instance, the test suite of the julia package runs
>> mainly sequential using one thread...
>
> I am aware of this scenario and I adapted the equasion for i
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 18:50, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Do we even care that much about accuracy? I don't really care that the
> build takes 30 or 31 seconds, or even 1 minute, but I certainly care
> whether it takes 30s or 3h. I think this is also what SBUs give you: a
> rough estimate of whi
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 15:13, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> 2. Disable the problematic tests. You may need to disable a whole test suite
> of
> similarly faulted tests, if they all behave the same.
I am becoming crazy… For instance this test randomly* fails:
@test mul!(C, vf, transpose(v
Hey!
It's been 3 months since I sent the last update [1]. This email was
meant to go out on Friday, but it seems opensmtpd was broken on my
machine, so it got stuck.
1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2021-08/msg00075.html
First, some good things:
I've been doing some performance
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
at it throws, after adding the missing polkit export:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix build -s aarch64-linux gnome-control-center -n
> guix build: error: gnu/packages/gnome.scm:5299:2: package
> `colord-minima
24 matches
Mail list logo
