On 2021-11-19, Philip McGrath wrote:
> On 11/19/21 09:54, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
>>> So, I guess I'm leaning towards making the guix lint check a little more
>>> lenient.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> That sounds even better, I’m all for it (changing (guix lint) + fixing
>
On 11/19/21 09:54, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
So, I guess I'm leaning towards making the guix lint check a little more
lenient.
Thoughts?
That sounds even better, I’m all for it (changing (guix lint) + fixing
the two remaining issues)!
It might also help to change
Hi Denis,
Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli 写道：
Even in source code form[1].
That's not the general consensus at all, but did you mean to
include a reference to someone who disagrees?
Kind regards,
T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 21:46:29 +0100
Domagoj Stolfa wrote:
> Hi:
>
> On Sat, Jul 03, 2021 at 10:16:54PM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> > Maxime,
> >
> > Maxime Devos 写道：
> > >
> >
> > That's a very good idea if possible.
>
> Why can substitutes not be offered for ZFS as a standalone modu
Ludovic Courtès writes:
… there’s probably more.
I noticed that we’re still using PYTHONPATH in a bunch of places,
even though we should now be using GUIX_PYTHONPATH. I’ve been
slowly hacking away at the remaining offenders.
That said, it’s amazing how much progress we made in so littl
Hey Guix,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> As a reminder, the plan I proposed¹ is to have a “flag day” shortly
> before ‘core-updates-frozen’ is merged into ‘master’ when we would run
> ‘guix style’ on the whole repo, thereby removing input labels from most
> packages.
> If everything
Foo Chuan Wei writes:
> In lisp-xyz.scm, I see that the "cl-locale" package has the same problem
> with its tests.
>
> Does anyone here know the cause of the error above?
Without having time to look at the code, but with the hope that this points you
in the right direction:
It probably has som
Hello Guix!
As a reminder, the plan I proposed¹ is to have a “flag day” shortly
before ‘core-updates-frozen’ is merged into ‘master’ when we would run
‘guix style’ on the whole repo, thereby removing input labels from most
packages.
Doing that before merging will (1) let us ensure there are no re
Hi there!
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> I hereby declare tomorrow, Thursday Nov. 18th, day of the on-line
> ‘core-updates-frozen’ sprint!
I’d like to congratulate ourselves and call it a success! A dedicated
group worked all day long anywhere-on-earth and pushed 79 commits fixing
a variety of thi
Hello,
Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
> Another strategy would be to reduce the overly cautious lint check:
>
> diff --git a/guix/lint.scm b/guix/lint.scm
> index ac2e7b3841..e795c466b1 100644
> --- a/guix/lint.scm
> +++ b/guix/lint.scm
> @@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ (define (starts-with-package-name? file-n
Hi!
zimoun skribis:
> Thanks for explaining. :-) Let rephrase: compare different behaviours
> [1] depending on lexical scope which is odd in the framework of
> "declarative". Anyway, your point is: it is a feature, not an issue,
> IIUC.
Exactly. :-)
We’re vey far from having the kind of
I have submitted patches to add Common Lisp packages "cl-assoc-utils" [1]
and "cl-let-over-lambda" [2]. If tests are enabled in the package
definition of these two packages, all test cases pass, but an error
occurs at the end of the 'check' phase. For example, the error message
for "cl-let-over-lam
12 matches
Mail list logo
