Am Mittwoch, den 20.01.2021, 16:08 -0500 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
> Leo Prikler writes:
>
> > There could potentially be another workaround by synchronizing
> > inside
> > guild, i.e. claiming a lock before reading and evaling any given
> > source
> > file. This would have the advantage of applyin
Leo Prikler writes:
> There could potentially be another workaround by synchronizing inside
> guild, i.e. claiming a lock before reading and evaling any given source
> file. This would have the advantage of applying to all guile packages,
> not just the ones that use guile-build-system, and it w
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> As the saying goes, “the cobbler’s children go barefoot”. Guile/Guix
> are no exception since Guile builds are non-reproducible, despite work
> done a few years ago:
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/20272
>
> Until it’s fixed in Guile proper, what do you t
Hi janneke,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> I have reset Guix' wip-full-source-bootstrap branch with a first working
> implementation of the, well, "Full Source Bootstrap" for x86-linux (and
> x86_64-linux). This bootstrap is rooted in the 357-byte hex0-seed from
> the Stage0 project (https://savan
Ludovic Courtès writes:
Hello,
> As the saying goes, “the cobbler’s children go barefoot”. Guile/Guix
> are no exception since Guile builds are non-reproducible, despite work
> done a few years ago:
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/20272
Ugh. Thanks for bringing this up again. Would you cons
Messed up ML address.
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Ludo,
IIUC this issue potentially affects all packages, that use Guile to
build more than two modules, no?
There could potentially be another workaround by synchronizing inside
guild, i.e. claiming a lock before reading and evaling any given source
f
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès ezt írta (időpont: 2021. jan. 20., Sze, 9:42):
>
> Hi!
>
> As the saying goes, “the cobbler’s children go barefoot”. Guile/Guix
> are no exception since Guile builds are non-reproducible, despite work
> done a few years ago:
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/20272
>
> Unti
Hi Ludo,
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 09:41, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Until it’s fixed in Guile proper, what do you think of building Guile
> 2.0/2.2/3.0 with #:parallel-build? #f ? We could do that in
> ‘core-updates’ now.
[...]
> We could also disable parallel builds in ‘guile-build-system’. It’
Hi!
As the saying goes, “the cobbler’s children go barefoot”. Guile/Guix
are no exception since Guile builds are non-reproducible, despite work
done a few years ago:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/20272
Until it’s fixed in Guile proper, what do you think of building Guile
2.0/2.2/3.0 with #:para
