Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)

"Bonface M. K." writes: > Wouldn't that be redundant? If you wanted to use > EXWM, we already have EXWM provided on MELPA, so > you could just set that up. That's IMHO though. Maybe there is a misunderstanding. We provide EXWM as a Guix package for those who don't want to use Emacs' own package

Re: Service implementation for LXQt desktop

On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:11:42 +0430 Reza Alizadeh Majd wrote: > Hi Guix, > > working on a service definition for LXQt desktop, I need to perform a > series of default configurations. for example to set the window > manager, prepare default panel, set the default theme, etc. > > these configurati

Re:Re: IceCat-78.2 preview on 'wip-icecat-78' branch; need icedove-78.

Patches sent to http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43663 Please review, thanks! At 2020-09-28 04:15:42, "Mark H Weaver" wrote: >Hi, > >"Zhu Zihao" writes: > >> @@ -1017,10 +1010,31 @@ from forcing GEXP-PROMISE." >> (lambda _ >> (use-modules (guix buil

Re: IceCat-78.2 preview on 'wip-icecat-78' branch; need icedove-78.

Jonathan Brielmaier writes: > I updated the patches in the mean time for 78.3.0, see > http://issues.guix.gnu.org/43647 Thank you, Jonathan! Your updated patches look good to me. I've followed up at and we can continue the discussion there. Best, M

Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)

Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Just tested, EXWM works with emacs-no-x-toolkit! > Just tested it too, and it works for me too :) > So I suggest we add the following packages: > > (define-public emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb >(package > (inherit emacs-xelb) > (name "emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb")

Re: IceCat-78.2 preview on 'wip-icecat-78' branch; need icedove-78.

Hi, "Zhu Zihao" writes: > @@ -1017,10 +1010,31 @@ from forcing GEXP-PROMISE." > (lambda _ > (use-modules (guix build cargo-utils)) > (let ((null-hash > "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855")) > - (substitute* '("

Re: Contribute to the translation of the user manual

Le 27 septembre 2020 16:03:28 GMT-04:00, Hubert Lombard a écrit : > >Hi Guix ! Hi Hubert! > >As a very basic end user of the Free Software, for more than 2 years, I >have been using Guix System with pleasure. Also, it really helps me. > >I would like to help with the translation. > >The manu

Contribute to the translation of the user manual

Hi Guix ! As a very basic end user of the Free Software, for more than 2 years, I have been using Guix System with pleasure. Also, it really helps me. I would like to help with the translation. The manual is translated my native language (french), however I noticed that some passages are lef

Re: IceCat-78.2 preview on 'wip-icecat-78' branch; need icedove-78.

On 22.09.20 21:00, Jonathan Brielmaier wrote: On 15.09.20 12:52, Mark H Weaver wrote: Hi Jonathan, Jonathan Brielmaier writes: I had a look. It's at the moment two WIP patches here: https://gitlab.com/jonsger/Guix/-/tree/wip-icedove-78 Thanks very much for working on it. Icedove 78 needs

Re: IceCat-78.2 preview on 'wip-icecat-78' branch; need icedove-78.

@@ -1017,10 +1010,31 @@ from forcing GEXP-PROMISE." (lambda _ (use-modules (guix build cargo-utils)) (let ((null-hash "e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855")) - (substitute* '("Cargo.lock" "gfx/wr/Cargo.lock") -

Mailing Lists List

When I google for “guix mailing lists” I am directed to https://savannah.gnu.org/mail/?group=guix which does not include guix-devel. It is returned as my second google link and also of course listed on the Guix website but would be helpful to include

Building a library as both static and dynamic

Is there a best practice or example for building a library twice, both static and dynamic? I submitted patch #43620, and in working on another library have the same issue. These are cmake builds with a parameter declaration for either a static or dynamic build, not both. I would like to create a