Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)

On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 at 10:28, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > If that's the case could you please add a comment in #41732 that points > to #43538 explaining that it solves the use cases of #41732, possibly > with some examples and/or a Coockbook section? Attempt currently happening… :-) See:

Problems with the test suite

I'm still working on making 43193 ready to apply. I added a test, and it looks like my to the build script --with-source option broke something. I am getting error messages, but I don't know where in the code they are occurring. Is there any way I can get a stack trace when errors are raised du

Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)

Feel free to send a patch with my emacs-lucid recipe if you feel that #43578 is not enough. Cheers! -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Failing CI evaluation for testing branch

Hi, Currently no substitutes are built for the testing branch because the evaluation fails. The log at https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/16794/log/raw ends with: --8<---cut here---start->8--- Generating package cache for '/gnu/store/shv4x9d7ghpxgvxira3hy85hs3c2b73j

Automation of SWH save (was: Cuirass: "lint -c archival"?)

Hi, On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 21:06, Christopher Baines wrote: > zimoun writes: > So, my understanding is that Software Heritage is a potential store for > source material for Guix packages. I think the majority of builds > Cuirass does are because inputs change, rather than the source of a > pack

Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)

Hi zimounn zimoun writes: > Hi, > > On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 19:29, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > >> P.S.: I also know there's the http://issues.guix.gnu.org/41732#7 >> "Implement a wrapper so users can build the Emacs packages using a >> version of their choosing" patch around, but it's for a diffe