Hi Guix,
I'm wondering why we use Lua 5.1 instead of LuaJIT for neovim? It seems
that upstream prefers LuaJIT given the non-default configure flag we
use[0] and their FAQ[1].
I don't have an opinion either way. I'm learning about neovim today, and
am curious how we arrived at our configurati
Hello :)
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Justus Winter skribis:
>> So I think two things need to happen before this step can be improved:
>> The package metadata should include the URL of the signature and a set
>> of cryptographic identities eligible for signing the artifact.
>
> The idea of storing
