On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 10:27:14AM +0200, Lars-Dominik Braun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve been looking into integrating pypy3 (a JIT Python 3 implementation)
> tighter into guix. Right now we have a package, but it’s not that
> useful, because there are no pypy3-* libraries.
pypy3 works somewhat well fo
Hi simon,
> Does it make sense to have something like "package-with-pypy" using
> "package-with-explicit-python"? Because it would be easy to rebuild
> all the pure Python packages with PyPy instead of CPython.
that’s what I am proposing with my patch, however due to different
search paths (/lib/
Hi all,
When I try to test guix builds for other architectures using the
qemu-binfmt-service and the --system flag, the configuration step is
failing to identify the compiler with the CMake build system. I did some
investigating, and it appears this is a failing test in CMake itself but
it causes
Dear,
Thank you for looking at this.
Does it make sense to have something like "package-with-pypy" using
"package-with-explicit-python"? Because it would be easy to rebuild
all the pure Python packages with PyPy instead of CPython.
All the best,
simon
