Re: qtwenengine anybody?

2020-01-01 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Pierre Neidhardt writes: > mike.ros...@gmail.com writes: > >> My conclusion is this is going to be way more work then the >> benefits. And once this was achieved it still needs to be >> maintained. Keep in mind QT already has a patch re base process with >> changes that might conflict with ungo

Re: qtwenengine anybody?

2020-01-01 Thread mike . rosset
Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Let me know if there are more changes you'd like to include to your > patch. > If no one objects, I'll merge it within a week. > > Cheers! I think the package is looking pretty good now. I sent some changes requested by Hartmut today so we might need to wait on any mor

Re: Allow system configuration without a bootloader

2020-01-01 Thread kanic...@yandex.ru
Yes, AFAIR it only works with ‘init’ and has no effect at all with ‘reconfigure’. 02.01.2020, 00:12, "Julien Lepiller" : > Le 1 janvier 2020 10:31:08 GMT-05:00, kanic...@yandex.ru a écrit : >> Hello. >> >> I am very happy with manually setting up my boot programs. On UEFI >> systems I don’t use

Re: Allow system configuration without a bootloader

2020-01-01 Thread Julien Lepiller
Le 1 janvier 2020 10:31:08 GMT-05:00, kanic...@yandex.ru a écrit : >Hello. > >I am very happy with manually setting up my boot programs. On UEFI >systems I don’t use a standalone bootloader at all, because I think it >is so unnecessary, and rely on Linux ‘EFI stub’ functionality. I don’t >ever wa

Re: qtwenengine anybody?

2020-01-01 Thread mike . rosset
Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Mike, have you tried building the package against ungoogled-chromium? > > Either way, I vote for including this package into Guix, it seems mature > enough. > We can open an issue to replace the bundled chromium with > ungoogled-chromium if need be. Sorry for the long

drop net-tools from %base-packages?

2020-01-01 Thread Simon Josefsson
Hello! While preparing a new release of GNU Inetutils, I read the following comment in ./gnu/system.scm net-tools; XXX: remove when Inetutils suffices and looked into what possible tools Guix would want from inetutils that aren't available already. I'm not sure

Re: qtwenengine anybody?

2020-01-01 Thread mike . rosset
Pierre Neidhardt writes: > I tested again on an Intel HD Graphics 620. > Everything works for me so far (navigating, smooth scrolling, rendering). > > I tested the following: > > - https://gnu.org > - https://ambrevar.xyz (has some CSS that may required hardware acceleration) > - https://github.c

Allow system configuration without a bootloader

2020-01-01 Thread kanichos
Hello. I am very happy with manually setting up my boot programs. On UEFI systems I don’t use a standalone bootloader at all, because I think it is so unnecessary, and rely on Linux ‘EFI stub’ functionality. I don’t ever want any automatic scripts to intervene. For a couple of years I have u

Re: Packaging Jami progress

2020-01-01 Thread Jan
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 10:40:09 +0100 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > P.S.: Have you managed to set up a public Git clone of Guix to share > you patches? > Okay, good news: I finally have a public repo at https://notabug.org/kromka_chleba/guix-jami/src/jami-wip My changes are on the jami-wip branch. Wo

Re: How can I set architecture/system-specific origin sources?

2020-01-01 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 03:00:50PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Hi Mathieu! > > Thanks for the details, this makes much more sense now! :) > So how can I thunk the source field then? > There's computed-origin-method that's floating around a couple of package modules or you can look at someth

disable substitutes for grub config and bootloader installation script

2020-01-01 Thread pkill9
rolling back the system shows it's trying to get substitutes for grub.cfg.drv and install-bootloader.scm.drv: ``` itsme@antelope ~> sudo guix system roll-back Password: substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://berlin.guixsd.org'... 100.0% substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://mirro