Hi Ricarco
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 15:47, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> PS: I also think that CRAN things in bioinformatics.scm should be moved
> to cran.scm, and even some or all of the R stuff in statistics.scm.
> (Same applies to Bioconductor packages, which should end up in
> bioconductor.scm wher
Dnia 2019-12-05, o godz. 15:32:23
Pierre Neidhardt napisał(a):
> - To call a custom function from the builder, you need to include the
> module that defines it for the build system, e.g.
>
> (arguments
> `(#:modules ((gnu packages telephony)
> ,@%gnu-build-system-modules
On 2019-12-09 04:45, Chris Marusich wrote:
> input in order to actually build the program. In this model, I guess
> every "*-src" package would have no inputs and just one output. I guess
> any package that produces an artifact, for example the "ripgrep"
> package, would list a bunch of "*-src"
Hey ho!
Mathieu Othacehe skribis:
>> Here’s my tentative config file.
>
> I just generated a disk-image with your config file! Just like you, I did
> hit the "unsupported ioctl" issue on both master and core-updates
> branch.
>
> The reason is that the command run when producing the disk image i
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> This is exactly what’s currently implemented if you look at
> ~/.guix-profile/manifest, under ‘provenance’.
But does "provenance" tell about the channels?
> Like zimoun writes, it would be nice to have some sort of a “describe”
> command for a regular profile. Actuall
Hi!
Robert Vollmert skribis:
> I wrote a series of articles related to my Elm packaging for Guix:
>
> https://vllmrt.net/spam/guix-elm-1.html
> https://vllmrt.net/spam/guix-elm-2.html
> https://vllmrt.net/spam/guix-elm-3.html
I’m late to the party, but I too find it real nice, both as an
introd
Hi!
Konrad Hinsen skribis:
>> One question arises though: channel specifications only make sense for
>> profiles generated with manifests.
>
> Not even for those, if the manifest uses inferior-packages. I'd go for
> per-package channel specifications. They could be optimized (more
> compact, mor
Hi,
Yay! We already have Gnome 3.32 on master!
Unfortunately, I've found one regression on XFCE/LXDE, as libwnck-2 does
not build anymore. I've open a bug report[1] with the proposed patch,
sorry I didn't noticed it sooner, but I haven't run a full
reconfiguration on my old machine with the bran
