Re: On DSLs

On +2019-12-03 15:12:32 +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Konrad Hinsen writes: > > >> Could this discussion be saved in the cookbook for instance? I'd like > >> to have this kind of discussion on the approach of guix and ideas > >> behind it somewhere more accessible than the ML archive. Does it

Re: [PATCH] WIP patches for the rust importer

Hi Martin, > On Dec 2, 2019, at 3:10 PM, Martin Becze wrote: > > When you say source import of the transitive dependencies, do you mean > that all the rust libs should just be source only or do you mean the top > level package should have to declare all the transitive dependencies? All rust lib

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Support publishing build events

Clément Lassieur writes: > Christopher Baines writes: > >> I guess so… I was probably just thinking about JSON from JSON fields >> in PostgreSQL, but we're not using PostgreSQL here. >> >> The one advantage I can think of is that not every Scheme object can be >> converted to JSON (at least wit

Re: Packaging Jami progress

On Tue, 03 Dec 2019 17:04:39 +0100 Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Hi! > > I suppose that if you deleted the 'configure phase, it's because there > is no ./configure file. > Is there a bootstrap file? There's no ./configure, nor ./bootstrap. > You probably want to use "PREFIX=" (in all caps). > Also

Re: Packaging Jami progress

Hello, I started working on updating Jami to the latest version and it seems it needs libnatpmp, because without it, compilation fails during doing something connected to UPnP. For that purpose I started packaging libnatpmp, but during the "install" stage, it fails with the following error: startin

Re: On DSLs

Hi, On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 15:36, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Konrad Hinsen writes: > >> Could this discussion be saved in the cookbook for instance? I'd like > >> to have this kind of discussion on the approach of guix and ideas > >> behind it somewhere more accessible than the ML archive. Does it

Re: On DSLs

Konrad Hinsen writes: >> Could this discussion be saved in the cookbook for instance? I'd like >> to have this kind of discussion on the approach of guix and ideas >> behind it somewhere more accessible than the ML archive. Does it make >> sense? > > I think it makes sense to archive summaries

Re: On DSLs

Hi Konrad, On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 11:29, Konrad Hinsen wrote: > > IOW, I think you can have a declarative _style_ in a full-blown > > language, like: > > Definitely, and that's what I am aiming for. There remains the security > issue of malevolent power users sneaking in innocuous-looking > non-d

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Support publishing build events

Hi Christopher! Christopher Baines writes: > I guess so… I was probably just thinking about JSON from JSON fields > in PostgreSQL, but we're not using PostgreSQL here. > > The one advantage I can think of is that not every Scheme object can be > converted to JSON (at least with guile-json), so b

Re: On DSLs

Hi Ludo, >> For better illustration, I'll try to rewrite my own manifests in the >> way I'd like to be able to write them. That's probably more useful >> than theory (a tough statement to make for a theoretician ;-) > > Agreed! Just to be clear: I actually intend to implement some infrastructure

Re: On DSLs

Hi Julien, > Could this discussion be saved in the cookbook for instance? I'd like > to have this kind of discussion on the approach of guix and ideas > behind it somewhere more accessible than the ML archive. Does it make > sense? I think it makes sense to archive summaries of such discussions.