On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 01:33:40AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> > 1 There is still some data transmitted when starting the browser for the
> > first time. It seems related to the "domain_reliability" component.
> > 3 Opening settings transmits a bunch of data, the next
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> The TODO list for convenience:
>>
>> * There is still some data transmitted when starting the browser for the
>> first time. It seems related to the "domain_reliability" component.
>> * Remove remaining "Web Store" links. Currently I've onl
Hi Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> The TODO list for convenience:
>
> * There is still some data transmitted when starting the browser for the
> first time. It seems related to the "domain_reliability" component.
> * Remove remaining "Web Store" links. Currently I've only found it in
> s
Gábor Boskovits writes:
> +) After bootstrapping a static glibc-2.2.5, I tried building a shared
> 2.2.5, 2.3, 2.3.4, 2.3.6, 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6. When all failed, I
> invested a couple of days to patch 2.3.6...but that started to look
> like a gargantuan undertaking. Iow, I
P
Lars Böckel ezt írta (időpont: 2018. szept. 2., V
3:47):
> Hello Guix,
>
> i wanted to recommend some changes to libvirt which would improve the
> usability of libvirt.
>
> 1) OVMF(UEFI) capability with QEMU. In NixOS you can achieve this with
>
>virtualisation.libvirtd.enable = true;
>
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 16:13:53 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I have to say that Andreas, Mark, Marius, and others who worked on
> IceCat and Chromium packaging are heroes: it’s a huge effort and we can
> be grateful for that!
I agree---I am very grateful for their work!
--
Mike Gerwitz
sig
Hello Guix,
i wanted to recommend some changes to libvirt which would improve the
usability of libvirt.
1) OVMF(UEFI) capability with QEMU. In NixOS you can achieve this with
virtualisation.libvirtd.enable = true;
virtualisation.libvirtd.qemuOvmf = true;
virtualisation.libvirtd.qemuVer
Joshua Branson transcribed 2.3K bytes:
> Amin Bandali writes:
>
> > Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> >
> >>> So the question is: can we push the Chromium package? I've read it's
> >>> almost ready[2].
> >>
> >> The TODO list for convenience:
> >>
> >> --8<---cut here---start
Hi Ricardo,
> Some of you know this already, but I think it’s time for a proper
> announcement here. I made a little something:
>
> https://issues.guix.info
Awesome, it looks pretty neat!
> The search box accepts issue numbers (for *any* bug on the GNU instance
> of Debbugs), but it also su
Hello Guix!
Some of you know this already, but I think it’s time for a proper
announcement here. I made a little something:
https://issues.guix.info
It tries to provide a friendlier web interface to Debbugs, the software
we use for tracking bugs that are sent to bug-g...@gnu.org and for
tra
Nils Gillmann writes:
> Please read into the chromium thread or search locally through it -
> Marius already had some comments on ungoogled-chromium. Our chromium
> browser is not just chromium taken from upstream. Many (maintained)
> patches are taken and applied.
Thanks for mentioning this. Y
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 11:32:30PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>
> > We are delighted to announce the release of GNU Mes 0.17, representing
> > 64 commits over 6 weeks.
> >
> > Mes is now an official GNU package and we have bootstrapped gcc-4.7.4
> > for x86-li
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 02:37:10PM +0200, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
> Done @ http://community.schemewiki.org/?FOSDEM2019
That looks great. Love the logo.
> I also pinged #scheme and racketeers.
>
> What about LUA people?
We'll try and connect.
Pj.
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 04:13:53PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I have to say that Andreas, Mark, Marius, and others who worked on
> IceCat and Chromium packaging are heroes: it’s a huge effort and we can
> be grateful for that!
So many heroes here!
Pj.
Jan Nieuwenhuizen ezt írta (időpont: 2018. aug. 31., P
18:32):
> We have been working on the wip-bootstrap branch with the aim to remove
> bootstrap binary seeds. At the moment this is for i686-linux only.
>
> The first step was to build binutils-mesboot-2.20.1a,
> glibc-mesboot-2.2.5 and gcc-me
Amin Bandali writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>>> So the question is: can we push the Chromium package? I've read it's
>>> almost ready[2].
>>
>> The TODO list for convenience:
>>
>> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>> * There is still some data transmitted wh
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 507 bytes:
> Hi,
>
> Amin Bandali skribis:
>
> > I highly recommend looking into ungoogled-chromium [0], which
> > "modifies Google Chromium to remove Google integration and
> > enhance privacy, control, and transparency". It's not exactly a
> > fork, but rather a se
Hello,
Benjamin Slade skribis:
> Speaking from a user-perspective, I would be very much in favour of
> having modern Firefox and Chromium (appropriately de-Googled as much as
> possible, of course) as actual Guix offerings.
>
> And while there are lots of objectionable things about the www in 20
Hi Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> We haven’t discussed the kind of event we would like to have, so here
> are some thoughts. I think it would be a good idea to use this
> opportunity to facilitate small group projects. We could start by
> having everyone think of a small Guix-related proje
Hi,
Amin Bandali skribis:
> I highly recommend looking into ungoogled-chromium [0], which
> "modifies Google Chromium to remove Google integration and
> enhance privacy, control, and transparency". It's not exactly a
> fork, but rather a series of patches and modifications they apply
> to each
Le ven. 31 août 2018 à 19:49, Pjotr Prins a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 07:40:35PM +0200, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
> > > How about a dev-room for 'fun freedom programming languages'. It may get
> > > a
> > > white space talk. Then, if I think of the work on MES and Guix it may
> > > not b
Pjotr Prins transcribed 466 bytes:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 07:36:35AM +, rchar01 wrote:
> > As an example, PureOS had a similar idea for the name.
> >
> > - https://www.pureos.net/
> > - from https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.en.html
>
> We should have some flavours:
>
> FunGuixOs
>
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 07:36:35AM +, rchar01 wrote:
> As an example, PureOS had a similar idea for the name.
>
> - https://www.pureos.net/
> - from https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.en.html
We should have some flavours:
FunGuixOs
SeriousGuixOs
VerySeriousGuixOS
VerySeriousGuixOSIndee
As an example, PureOS had a similar idea for the name.
- https://www.pureos.net/
- from https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.en.html
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On August 31, 2018 5:54 PM, Amirouche Boubekki
wrote:
> > > > If we want an
> > > > imp
24 matches
Mail list logo
