Nils Gillmann writes:
>> I'm looking into switching gnurl to bmake + mk-config. I've already got the
>> tools on my side.
>> Do you want me to continue the native autotools support for Guix in gnurl,
>> derived from curl? Or would it be okay to switch guix over to bmake +
>> mk-config if it work
Nils Gillmann transcribed 1.3K bytes:
> Ludovic Courtès transcribed 474 bytes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nils Gillmann skribis:
> >
> > > Seems like ftp.gnu.org is currently either very slow or having troubles
> > > with the actual software distribution. The signatures landed on there,
> > > the rest has
Le 2018-04-09 17:30, l...@gnu.org a écrit :
Hello!
Pjotr Prins skribis:
Indeed, I love working with Guix and developing with Guix. Guix takes
care of my deployment and configuration requirements.
I have written some time in the past that with Guix you don't need
autotools. The main thing aut
Hello,
Chris Marusich skribis:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> So, we still have a decision to make: whether to delete these generated
>> files (possibly in a snippet) to avoid using pre-generated non-source
>> files in our build. I would be in favor of it.
>>
>> I'd like to hear opinions on this
Hello!
Pjotr Prins skribis:
> Indeed, I love working with Guix and developing with Guix. Guix takes
> care of my deployment and configuration requirements.
>
> I have written some time in the past that with Guix you don't need
> autotools. The main thing autotools solve is configuring the build
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'guix-packages' has been submitted
by the Spanish team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/guix-packages/es.po
(We can arrange thi
