ng0 writes:
> Leo Famulari transcribed 1.4K bytes:
>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 08:16:40PM +0100, Catonano wrote:
>> > recently I read that we should move to using this invoke procedure instead
>
> Could you tell me where you've read this? It's news to me aswell.
>
You can check out this thread:
h
Leo Famulari transcribed 1.4K bytes:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 08:16:40PM +0100, Catonano wrote:
> > recently I read that we should move to using this invoke procedure instead
Could you tell me where you've read this? It's news to me aswell.
> > of the (system* some-script) in defining little scr
Amirouche Boubekki transcribed 1.5K bytes:
> Héllo all,
>
> I restarted from scratch the gnunet-guile bindings. It was made
> much easier thanks to the work of ng0 on gnunet documentation and
> guile-bytestructures to handle C structs and unions.
>
> You need guix from today with latest guile-byt
Hey,
this is barely on topic for this list, but the institute where I work is
still looking for two HPC sysadmins. Here’s the job ad, which is still
valid, even though it has officially expired:
https://www.mdc-berlin.de/career/jobs/2-linuxhpc-system-administrator-fm
At the MDC we’re using G
Héllo all,
I restarted from scratch the gnunet-guile bindings. It was made
much easier thanks to the work of ng0 on gnunet documentation and
guile-bytestructures to handle C structs and unions.
You need guix from today with latest guile-bytestructures 1.0.1.
You can get the code using the follo
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 08:16:40PM +0100, Catonano wrote:
> recently I read that we should move to using this invoke procedure instead
> of the (system* some-script) in defining little scripts in packages and
> services definitions
>
> But I can't remember where exactly
>
> Where is this invoke p
recently I read that we should move to using this invoke procedure instead
of the (system* some-script) in defining little scripts in packages and
services definitions
But I can't remember where exactly
Where is this invoke procedure defined ?
I'm specifically interested in an exception to be ra
nee transcribed 44K bytes:
> Hello, I fixed a bunch of problems I had and now I've been adding
> database migrations when the package version changes.
> This is very insufficiently tested right now.
> I only tested this with one pre-existing installation so far, but it
> seems to work fine there. I
Hello, I fixed a bunch of problems I had and now I've been adding
database migrations when the package version changes.
This is very insufficiently tested right now.
I only tested this with one pre-existing installation so far, but it
seems to work fine there. I want write system tests to cover eac
ng0 transcribed 106K bytes:
> guix offload test works.
>
> however when I try to actually build on the machine, some part fails.
>
> any advice on what could be wrong?
New error, without verbosity (building chromium from my branch):
process 4982 acquired build slot '/var/guix/offload/192.168.1.
10 matches
Mail list logo
