Re: gcc-ddc

Hi Gábor, > I'm using the getenv approach Ricardo suggested. I've not written a wrapper > yet, the environment variables are set from the build. Maybe that’s sufficient already. Since the result of this package is not going to be used as an input to build software it may not actually need a wra

Re: [bootstrappable] Re: prototyping the full source bootstrap path

Hi, "Orians, Jeremiah (DTMB)" writes: >> Hmm, it's my understanding that Guile is pretty heavily tied to >> libguile/*.c. What makes you think that it's possible for Guile to >> run without libguile/*.c? > https://wingolog.org/archives/2016/01/11/the-half-strap-self-hosting-and-guile > > Specif

Re: gcc-ddc

Gábor Boskovits writes: Hey Gábor, > Jan, I can now pass the test you have in the original patch, which > basically builds gcc-4.7.4 twice, and  checks if gcc/bin are > identical. Woohoo! Amazing work! > I'm using the getenv approach Ricardo suggested. I've not written a wrapper > yet, the en

[PATCH] scripts: hash: Add --git option. WIP

Hi! Attached is a patch to get the hash of a git archive without having to clean the tree or do a clean checkout. Using guix hash -gr . procudes the same hash as doing something like git clone . tmp && guix hash -rx tmp && rm -r tmp I marked it as WIP because while it is already "hand

Re: maxima: The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled

Kei Kebreau writes: > > I turns out that the issue is with stratified garbage collection in > GCL. The substitute from hydra.gnu.org does in fact give me the error > when I run "(si::sgc-on t)" in the REPL. I'm preparing a patch to update > GCL to the version used in Debian stable (GCL git tag "pa

Re: maxima: The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled

Alex Vong writes: > Kei Kebreau writes: > >> Alex Vong writes: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> When I start maxima, I get the following warning message: >>> >>> The SGC segfault recovery test failed with >>> memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled >>> The SGC segfault recovery test failed with >>>

Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Chris Marusich writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> >>> Hi Guix, >>> >>> some of our Java packages now only build with icedtea-8. To avoid >>> incompatibilities we should make icedtea-8 the default and make sure >>> that all packages still build with that version. >>

Re: FOSDEM 2018 and announcing a GNU Guix/Guile day!

I am booking a room at ICAB for 3 nights. Anyone else want to stay? They ask you to book now, and you have to be pretty sure. It is a 20 minutes walk to downtown. I think that is perfect. Pj. On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 07:55:40PM +0100, Pjotr Prins wrote: > We are hosting a GNU Guix and Guile day o

Re: gcc-ddc

Hello! Jan, I can now pass the test you have in the original patch, which basically builds gcc-4.7.4 twice, and checks if gcc/bin are identical. I'm using the getenv approach Ricardo suggested. I've not written a wrapper yet, the environment variables are set from the build. As the gcc binary dep

Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK

Chris Marusich writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Hi Guix, >> >> some of our Java packages now only build with icedtea-8. To avoid >> incompatibilities we should make icedtea-8 the default and make sure >> that all packages still build with that version. >> >> Who would like to help with th

Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Hi Guix, > > some of our Java packages now only build with icedtea-8. To avoid > incompatibilities we should make icedtea-8 the default and make sure > that all packages still build with that version. > > Who would like to help with this? We can do this in a separate br