l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> Shouldn’t we replace Wicd with NetworkManager in ‘%desktop-services’?
>
> I’ve given it a try on a GuixSD GNOME installation and it appears to
> work well, and it’s obviously well-integrated with GNOME, whereas Wicd
> is a bit hidden (one ha
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Kei Kebreau writes:
>
>> Mark H Weaver writes:
>>
>>> k...@openmailbox.org (Kei Kebreau) writes:
>>>
@@ -2172,6 +2176,10 @@ point numbers.")
("shared-mime-info" ,shared-mime-info)))
(arguments
`(#:phases (modify-phases %standard-pha
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 04:23:43PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Ricardo added biber-2.5 in 253cdd6c1464c944be2418ee9161f5f5b57e0eee.
> Ricardo, can you check if it's still necessary?
I tried to find out myself, but the location of the relevant information
is not documented in our packaging.
> > A
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:26:22PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Woow, impressive patch set! At first sight the 26 patches look
> reasonable to me, so I would suggest pushing them, along with the
> biber-next@2.7 update you mentioned.
Alright, I'll clean it up and push today.
> As for biber it
Hi Hartmut,
On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 21:38:30 +0200
Hartmut Goebel wrote:
>I thing it's time to (at least try to) add a KDE desktop service to Guix
> Now I wonder, how to do this. Taking gnome-desktop-service as a
> template, I can spot only "gnome-settings-daemon" as being different to
> xfce-deskt
Hi,
I thing it's time to (at least try to) add a KDE desktop service to
guix. All major components should be available and if not this will show
us what is missing.
Now I wonder, how to do this. Taking gnome-desktop-service as a
template, I can spot only "gnome-settings-daemon" as being different
Pjotr Prins transcribed 0.9K bytes:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:18:59PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > Ludovic Court??s writes:
> >
> > > Now, as someone who doesn???t use GNOME, I wonder if NM would work well
> > > for me. Last time I tried it???s CLI was too low-level to be usable, and
>
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:18:59PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Ludovic Court??s writes:
>
> > Now, as someone who doesn???t use GNOME, I wonder if NM would work well
> > for me. Last time I tried it???s CLI was too low-level to be usable, and
> > I don???t remember seeing a curses interface
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 04:50:58PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> Shouldn’t we replace Wicd with NetworkManager in ‘%desktop-services’?
>
> I’ve given it a try on a GuixSD GNOME installation and it appears to
> work well, and it’s obviously well-integrated with GNOME, whereas Wic
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Shouldn’t we replace Wicd with NetworkManager in ‘%desktop-services’?
>
> I’ve given it a try on a GuixSD GNOME installation and it appears to
> work well, and it’s obviously well-integrated with GNOME, whereas Wicd
> is a bit hidden (one has to know what t
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Now, as someone who doesn’t use GNOME, I wonder if NM would work well
> for me. Last time I tried it’s CLI was too low-level to be usable, and
> I don’t remember seeing a curses interface. Suggestions?
I would welcome some improvement here, or insight on my part. Sinc
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.6K bytes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> Shouldn’t we replace Wicd with NetworkManager in ‘%desktop-services’?
>
> I’ve given it a try on a GuixSD GNOME installation and it appears to
> work well, and it’s obviously well-integrated with GNOME, whereas Wicd
> is a bit hidden (one
Hello Guix!
Shouldn’t we replace Wicd with NetworkManager in ‘%desktop-services’?
I’ve given it a try on a GuixSD GNOME installation and it appears to
work well, and it’s obviously well-integrated with GNOME, whereas Wicd
is a bit hidden (one has to know what to look for) and “foreign.”
Thoughts
Adonay Felipe Nogueira transcribed 0.3K bytes:
> Do you mean creating a new patch report in guix-patches (even though the
> patches have already been sent to guix-patches)? This would result in
> two patch submissions being openned (one which is the older, and is
> still open, and other that would
Do you mean creating a new patch report in guix-patches (even though the
patches have already been sent to guix-patches)? This would result in
two patch submissions being openned (one which is the older, and is
still open, and other that would be the new one).
Adonay Felipe Nogueira transcribed 0.7K bytes:
> Hi, I have sent some patches, see
> [[http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2017-06/msg00831.html]].
Can you please resend them to guix-patc...@gnu.org in case
no one has reviewed them? It's easier to be able to track
them.
--
ng0
GnuPG: A
16 matches
Mail list logo
