Re: core-updates summer 2017

Leo Famulari writes: > I just started a new evaluation of core-updates and am reconfiguring my > GuixSD system based on it. > > Let's use this thread to discuss the state of the branch. Would this be the time to enable the ACL tests as previously discussed? signature.asc Description: PGP signa

my recent messages

Hi, I want to apologize. While I did not mean to attack or make anyones work look bad, it happened nevertheless. Some people will always read between the lines, even when I never have any subtext and always express what I mean. Since Summer/Spring '15 I worked on creating a system, most of the re

Re: core-updates on Hurd

Hello, On 07/09/2017 05:10:47 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: The problem was that ‘struct dirent64’ is slightly different on GNU/Hurd than on GNU/Linux. Rennes, could you confirm that it works for you? The solution works, Thanks

Re: Installer, ISO9660, etc.

> What’s the /dev name in your case? In the working case as a CD, it's /dev/sr0. In the non-working case on a USB flash drive, it's /dev/sda and /dev/sda1. There's a dummy partition in the iso image as well, so I'm not sure why /dev/sda1 doesn't work as well... let's see... When fdisk says that

Re: Installer, ISO9660, etc.

Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > Aha! > > I finally found why I couldn't use the iso9660 image on an usb stick. > > Fix: > > diff --git a/gnu/build/file-systems.scm b/gnu/build/file-systems.scm > index b6930497d..7f2c5dcb0 100644 > --- a/gnu/build/file-systems.scm > +++ b/gnu/build/file-systems.scm

core-updates summer 2017

I just started a new evaluation of core-updates and am reconfiguring my GuixSD system based on it. Let's use this thread to discuss the state of the branch. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: FW: [oss-security] accepting new members to (linux-)distros lists

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:53:24PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > If there were another Guix member who could split the task, and had > > someone to vouch for them, that could make it possible. But based on the > > replies in the last 10 days, it doesn't seem to be the c

Re: 34/44: gnu: Add texlive-fonts-ec.

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > This message seems to indicate that: > >> svn: E000110: Unable to connect to a repository at URL >> 'svn://www.tug.org/texlive/tags/texlive-2017.1/Master/texmf-dist/fonts/source/jknappen/ec' >> svn: E000110: Unknown hostname 'www.tug.org' > > I’ve tried downloading this

Re: FW: [oss-security] accepting new members to (linux-)distros lists

Leo Famulari skribis: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:48:22PM +0800, Alex Vong wrote: >> Leo Famulari writes: >> >> [...] >> > But, the "Stack Clash" issues took us by surprise and we spent a few >> > days writing and testing our fixes. We are committed to supporting >> > 32-bit platforms where th

Re: FW: [oss-security] accepting new members to (linux-)distros lists

Leo Famulari skribis: > On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 01:33:05PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> > The real question is about our commitment to contribute back. >> > Presumably only one or two of us would be on that list, so they would >> > largely have that res

RPC pipelining

Hello Guix! One of the main sources of slowness when talking to a remote daemon, as with GUIX_DAEMON_SOCKET=guix://…, is the many RPCs that translate in lots of network round trips: --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ GUIX_PROFILING=rpc ./pre-inst-env guix build in

Re: [PATCH] service: Fix arguments passing in the 'restart' action.

Hello, 宋文武 skribis: > * modules/shepherd/service.scm (action): Use 'apply' to invoke the 'start' > procedure in the 'restart' action. > --- > modules/shepherd/service.scm | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/modules/shepherd/service.scm b/modules/shepherd/ser

Re: cuirass evaluate

Hi Mathieu, Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > Now that Cuirass uses (guix git), I'm trying to robustify specification > evaluation. Currently Cuirass calls a binary called "evaluate" to get a > job list from a specification. > > I don't like the idea of this extra "evaluate" script because : > > * We

Re: python-conda: Build is not reproducible

Cool, thanks! On 9 Jul 2017 11:10 p.m., "Ludovic Courtès" wrote: > Hi Frederick, > > Frederick Muriithi skribis: > > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> This is most likely a consequence of . > >> > >> Can you run: > >> > >

Re: Installer, ISO9660, etc.

Aha! I finally found why I couldn't use the iso9660 image on an usb stick. Fix: diff --git a/gnu/build/file-systems.scm b/gnu/build/file-systems.scm index b6930497d..7f2c5dcb0 100644 --- a/gnu/build/file-systems.scm +++ b/gnu/build/file-systems.scm @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ not valid header was found.