On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:29:09AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Kei Kebreau writes:
>
> > I think it may be a good idea to consolidate spelling and grammar
> > packages into language.scm (or a new spelling.scm file if the former is
> > not appropriate). This would include packages such as as
Hi Guix,
I’ve been using GuixSD for a couple of months now, and it is super
cool. Thanks for all your hard work! There is one little thing,
though. :)
There’s a feature request (bug #26608) about adding an
“--only-substitutes” flag to “guix package -u”, which would only upgrade
packages that have
Hello!
I just pushed another improvement:
d27cc3bfaafe6b5b0831e88afb1c46311d382a0b significantly reduces the
number of ‘stat’ calls when discovering .scm files. I’d be curious to
see what impact it has on NFS.
Commit cbee955901b3e252ebdeb8066a2196055149198a also reduces the number
of ‘stat’ call
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:26 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> I had to comment out some snippets from activation.scm:
>>
>> ;; activate-modprobe
>> ;; activate-firmware
>> ;; activate-ptrace-attach
>
> Yeah, ‘guix system container’ does that too:
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/g
Hi,
On Tue, 30 May 2017 10:24:34 +0200
Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Upon failure it can print the location of the build log.
I'm trying to get this to work but
guix build --log-file foo
doesn't seem to print the location of the build log in the failure case...
Is it possible to get to it someh
Mark H Weaver writes:
> k...@openmailbox.org (Kei Kebreau) writes:
>
>> kkebreau pushed a commit to branch master
>> in repository guix.
>>
>> commit a512ca81e8998d86770f5a088a9563bc3f24560f
>> Author: Kei Kebreau
>> Date: Thu Jun 15 22:16:40 2017 -0400
>>
>> gnu: gmime: Update to 3.0.1.
>
k...@openmailbox.org (Kei Kebreau) writes:
> kkebreau pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> commit a512ca81e8998d86770f5a088a9563bc3f24560f
> Author: Kei Kebreau
> Date: Thu Jun 15 22:16:40 2017 -0400
>
> gnu: gmime: Update to 3.0.1.
>
> * gnu/packages/mail.scm
* Proposal
zip bomb (zip archives without a top level directory) handling should
not be done in `url-fetch/zipbomb'. It should be implemented as a
boolean argument to the `unpack' phase.
Likewise for url-fetch/tarbomb as well.
* Rationale
I'm changing the download method of a few packages to u
Ricardo Wurmus transcribed 0.7K bytes:
>
> ng0 writes:
>
> > I was just asking because this seems to differ on systems updated
> > with `guix pull` and those through git. My intended build machine
> > uses /etc/guix/ and the master uses /usr/local/, both are GuixSD.
> > Then /etc/guix is specifi
ng0 writes:
> I was just asking because this seems to differ on systems updated
> with `guix pull` and those through git. My intended build machine
> uses /etc/guix/ and the master uses /usr/local/, both are GuixSD.
> Then /etc/guix is specificed in 'guix pull' updates.
Who is “the master”? I
Ricardo Wurmus transcribed 0.5K bytes:
>
> ng0 writes:
>
> > user@abyayala ~$ sudo guix archive --generate-key
> > guix archive: error: key pair exists under '/usr/local/etc/guix'; remove it
> > first
> >
> > Is this location picked to keep compability with other Operating Systems?
> > It seems
Kei Kebreau writes:
> I think it may be a good idea to consolidate spelling and grammar
> packages into language.scm (or a new spelling.scm file if the former is
> not appropriate). This would include packages such as aspell and its
> dictionaries, hunspell, enchant, and any others that I might
ng0 writes:
> user@abyayala ~$ sudo guix archive --generate-key
> guix archive: error: key pair exists under '/usr/local/etc/guix'; remove it
> first
>
> Is this location picked to keep compability with other Operating Systems?
> It seems to be the only part of Guix which picks /usr/
This depe
13 matches
Mail list logo
