Marius Bakke skribis:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> There are a quite a few ruby packages failing after the switch to 2.4:
>>
>> https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109665?compare=master#tabs-now-fail
>>
>> We also have test failures in "lightdm" and "sssd":
>>
>> https://hydra.gnu.org/build/2084542
>> htt
Danny Milosavljevic skribis:
> On Sun, 28 May 2017 23:12:44 +0200
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Danny Milosavljevic skribis:
>>
>> >> Perhaps for `guix package`, but I disagree for `guix build` and others.
>> >> It prints *only* the new store items on stdout, and th
Marius Bakke writes:
> There are a quite a few ruby packages failing after the switch to 2.4:
>
> https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109665?compare=master#tabs-now-fail
>
> We also have test failures in "lightdm" and "sssd":
>
> https://hydra.gnu.org/build/2084542
> https://hydra.gnu.org/build/2085014
>
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> Apparently ‘staging’ is fully built on i686/x86_64. Should we merge it?
>
> I’d like to start building ‘core-updates’ now (we’re 6 days late :-)),
> but we should get ‘staging’ out of the way first.
I think we can start building the 'core' package set n
Roel Janssen writes:
> Dear Guix,
>
> Here's a patch for kaiju. A C++ program without any dependencies, plus
> some additional scripts that need perl.
>
> Kind regards,
> Roel Janssen
This was supposed to go to guix-patches instead. Sorry for the noise.
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> I agree that we could do a lot more things with a faster ‘guix
> environment’. My guess is that it won’t be easy to go optimize, and
> very hard to go below 1 second. We should profile that and see what can
> be done.
FWIW, on our NFS-mounted /gnu, the 'guix environme
Dear Guix,
Here's a patch for kaiju. A C++ program without any dependencies, plus
some additional scripts that need perl.
Kind regards,
Roel Janssen
>From ed45f47f7514faf10710b41a7d5e9cdaa8217c70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roel Janssen
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:01:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH]
Hello,
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 04:48:38PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> I try building a package using openexr. Building fails with
> /gnu/store/…-openexr-2.2.0/include/OpenEXR/ImfInt64.h:44:24:
> fatal error: ImathInt64.h: No such file or directory
> but file …-openexr-2.2.0/include/OpenEXR/Imat
Hi Guix,
I had to update my system configuration, which contains a boot menu entry for another
distribution, to use the new bootloader API, but the manual section on dual boot
configuration (https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/guix.html#index-dual-boot) was
not updated for this new API.
Am 01.06.2017 um 00:22 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic:
> Is that gcc? Which version?
It's an up to date guix system, nothing special.
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impos
Le 2017-06-01 00:22, Danny Milosavljevic a écrit :
Hi Hartmut,
On Tue, 30 May 2017 16:48:38 +0200
Hartmut Goebel wrote:
/gnu/store/…-openexr-2.2.0/include/OpenEXR/ImfInt64.h:44:24:
fatal error: ImathInt64.h: No such file or directory
but file …-openexr-2.2.0/include/OpenEXR/ImathInt64.h exis
11 matches
Mail list logo